update description file

[d-morrison]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

PR Preview Action v1.8.1-2-g6ad689f
Preview removed because the pull request was closed.
2026-06-05 00:53 UTC

[d-morrison]

@claude review

[claude]

Claude finished @d-morrison's task in 58s —— View job

---

PR Review: update description file

• Read CLAUDE.md for repo guidelines (no CLAUDE.md found)
• Review DESCRIPTION file changes
• Post review feedback

---

Review Summary

This PR makes three changes to the DESCRIPTION file: replaces placeholder author info with real authors, updates the roxygen2 version configuration, and removes the old RoxygenNote field.

What Looks Good

Author information updated correctly (DESCRIPTION:4-7)
The placeholder person("First", "Last", ...) has been replaced with real team members. The c() wrapper for multiple authors is correct R syntax, and the positional person(given, family, , email, role) double-comma convention (skipping middle) is valid.

roxygen2 version update (DESCRIPTION:13 removed, DESCRIPTION:27 added)
Replacing RoxygenNote: 7.3.2 with Config/roxygen2/version: 8.0.0 is the correct approach for roxygen2 8.x. RoxygenNote is auto-generated by older devtools::document() invocations; the Config/ field is the proper key for the newer version.

---

Suggestions

Title and Description fields are still placeholders (DESCRIPTION:2, DESCRIPTION:8)

Title: What the Package Does (One Line, Title Case)
Description: What the package does (one paragraph).

These should be filled in — R package checks (R CMD check) will warn if they remain as defaults. Fix this →

ORCID identifiers omitted
The original template included comment = c(ORCID = "YOUR-ORCID-ID") as a placeholder. Adding real ORCID IDs for the authors improves scholarly attribution and is a common best practice for academic R packages.

Config/roxygen2/version placement (DESCRIPTION:27)
The field is placed at the very end of the file, after Language. Convention is to keep it near the Roxygen: list(markdown = TRUE) field for readability. Not a functional issue, but worth tidying.

---

Overall

The core changes are correct and well-formed. The main follow-up item is filling in the Title and Description placeholders to avoid R CMD check warnings.