Conversation
Co-authored-by: TimHess <3947063+TimHess@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: TimHess <3947063+TimHess@users.noreply.github.com>
…umentation Co-authored-by: TimHess <3947063+TimHess@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: TimHess <3947063+TimHess@users.noreply.github.com>
|
@copilot I didn't realize opening and closing a PR would be a viable solution here - can it be the same PR (or issue) that's closed/open/modified? If we could edit or open/close the same PR it would be even less of a hassle. Also, this process doesn't appear to require human intervention, so we can run it every 59 days and forget about the buffer window |
Co-authored-by: TimHess <3947063+TimHess@users.noreply.github.com>
Yes, great suggestions! I've updated the workflow to:
The workflow now:
Commit: cfa441d |
- bump a couple other action refs - whitespace cleanup
Co-authored-by: TimHess <3947063+TimHess@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: TimHess <3947063+TimHess@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Bart Koelman <104792814+bart-vmware@users.noreply.github.com>
- shell vars all lowercase_with_underscores, env vars UPPER_SNAKE - consistent conditional formatting - consistent fallback for branch - reduce verbosity
GitHub disables scheduled workflows after 60 days of repository inactivity. This workflow prevents deactivation.
Implementation
keep-alive-workflowbranchWhy empty commits
Empty commits generate activity without modifying repository content. The draft PR is reopened/closed to register activity.
Fully automated. No human intervention required.
✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.