Skip to content

fix: Inefficient N+1 query pattern in coupling analysis#158

Open
mrwind-up-bird wants to merge 2 commits intoSimplyLiz:developfrom
mrwind-up-bird:autofix/b3cf0967/inefficient-n-1-query-pattern-
Open

fix: Inefficient N+1 query pattern in coupling analysis#158
mrwind-up-bird wants to merge 2 commits intoSimplyLiz:developfrom
mrwind-up-bird:autofix/b3cf0967/inefficient-n-1-query-pattern-

Conversation

@mrwind-up-bird
Copy link
Collaborator

AutoFix: Inefficient N+1 query pattern in coupling analysis

Category: performance
Severity: medium

Issue

Each file is processed individually with separate ckb coupling commands, creating N+1 subprocess calls instead of batch processing, leading to poor performance on large changesets.

Fix

The fix addresses the N+1 query pattern by removing the individual file processing loop and instead using a single batch operation. The coupling analysis is now performed once with all changed files passed as a comma-separated list to the --files parameter, eliminating the subprocess overhead for each individual file. The analysis step is moved to the report generation phase to maintain the same functionality while improving performance.


Generated by nyxCore AutoFix

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 19, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 53.79630% with 998 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
cmd/ckb/setup.go 0.0% 161 Missing ⚠️
internal/suggest/analyzer.go 53.6% 142 Missing and 12 partials ⚠️
internal/testgap/analyzer.go 12.3% 140 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
internal/query/compound_refactor.go 37.1% 105 Missing and 15 partials ⚠️
internal/query/prepare_rename.go 0.0% 70 Missing ⚠️
internal/mcp/server.go 19.1% 51 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️
internal/mcp/tool_impls_compound.go 46.3% 41 Missing and 10 partials ⚠️
internal/query/prepare_move.go 63.1% 32 Missing and 6 partials ⚠️
internal/audit/analyzer.go 21.0% 30 Missing ⚠️
internal/query/compound.go 25.0% 24 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
... and 13 more
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #158     +/-   ##
=========================================
+ Coverage     45.1%   45.6%   +0.5%     
=========================================
  Files          350     367     +17     
  Lines        59747   61934   +2187     
=========================================
+ Hits         26961   28278   +1317     
- Misses       30960   31741    +781     
- Partials      1826    1915     +89     
Flag Coverage Δ
unit 45.6% <53.7%> (+0.5%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants