Fix CI on Julia 1.11+ (drop conflicting [sources])#2
Merged
Conversation
…1.11+) The CI 'Develop unregistered PureKLU dependency' step (Pkg.develop(url=...)) conflicts with a [sources] entry for the same package on Julia 1.11+, failing the 1.11 and 1 jobs (1.10 ignores [sources] and passed). The develop step alone resolves PureKLU on every version, so drop [sources]. Co-Authored-By: Chris Rackauckas <accounts@chrisrackauckas.com> Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Chris Rackauckas <accounts@chrisrackauckas.com> Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The CI
Develop unregistered PureKLU dependencystep (Pkg.develop(url=...)) conflicts with the[sources]entry for the same package on Julia 1.11+, so the 1.11 and 1 jobs failed at that step (1.10 ignores[sources]and passed the full test run). The develop step alone resolves PureKLU on every version, so this drops[sources].Note: this is a band-aid for the unregistered-PureKLU workaround. The root cause is the hard dependency on the unregistered
SciML/PureKLU.jl; a follow-up could make the sparse-LU backend pluggable (default to stdlib UMFPACK, PureKLU optional for generic eltypes), which removes the workaround and the registration blocker entirely.🤖 Generated with Claude Code