Skip to content

Conversation

@Claude
Copy link

@Claude Claude AI commented Feb 7, 2026

Implements a comprehensive test harness for multi-threaded raster I/O operations using GDAL with Python, supporting both GeoTIFF and ERS grid formats.

Core Components

  • Thread-safe GDAL wrappers: ThreadSafeRasterReader and ThreadSafeRasterWriter classes handle concurrent raster access using thread-local datasets and locks
  • Thread coordination: RasterThreadManager provides block-based parallelization and benchmarking utilities
  • Test harness: RasterTestHarness class orchestrates multi-threaded read/write tests with configurable block sizes and thread counts

Usage Example

from raster_threading import RasterTestHarness

# Test GeoTIFF operations with 4 threads
harness = RasterTestHarness(num_threads=4, block_size=256)
results = harness.test_geotiff_read_write(
    width=1024, 
    height=1024, 
    bands=3
)

# Test ERS grid operations
results = harness.test_ers_read_write(
    width=1024,
    height=1024,
    bands=1
)

# Compare single vs multi-threaded performance
comparison = harness.compare_single_vs_multi_threaded(
    width=2048,
    height=2048,
    format='GTiff'
)

Key Features

  • Per-thread dataset instances to avoid GDAL threading conflicts
  • Configurable block-based tiling for parallel processing
  • Built-in benchmarking and performance comparison
  • Data integrity validation (checksums, pixel-by-pixel comparison)
  • Support for both formats with driver-specific optimizations
Original prompt

Design a test harness to use gdal via python to read and write to rasters in multi-threaded fashion. Use both geotiffs and ers grids in your work.

Co-authored-by: RichardScottOZ <72196131+RichardScottOZ@users.noreply.github.com>
@Claude Claude AI changed the title [WIP] Add test harness for GDAL with multi-threaded raster handling Add multi-threaded GDAL test harness for GeoTIFF and ERS raster formats Feb 7, 2026
@Claude Claude AI requested a review from RichardScottOZ February 7, 2026 22:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants