Improve pull request template with accessibility checklist

[Mohitswamii]

Related Issue

Closes #1107

Description

Improved the existing PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md by adding accessibility checklist items, better contributor guidance, and improved PR review structure.

Changes Made

• Added accessibility checklist
• Improved template readability
• Added additional notes section
• Enhanced reviewer guidance

Type of Change

• Documentation update

[vercel]

@Mohitswamii is attempting to deploy a commit to the PRIYANSHU DOSHI's projects Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

[github-actions]

GSSoC Label Checklist 🏷️

@Priyanshu-byte-coder — please apply the appropriate labels before merging:

Difficulty (pick one):

• level:beginner — 20 pts
• level:intermediate — 35 pts
• level:advanced — 55 pts
• level:critical — 80 pts

Quality (optional):

• quality:clean — ×1.2 multiplier
• quality:exceptional — ×1.5 multiplier

Validation (required to score):

• gssoc:approved — counts for points
• gssoc:invalid / gssoc:spam / gssoc:ai-slop — does not score

Type labels (type:*) are auto-detected from files and title. Review and adjust if needed.
Points formula: (difficulty × quality_multiplier) + type_bonus

[github-actions]

Thanks for your first PR on DevTrack! 🎉

A maintainer will review it within 48 hours. While you wait:

• Make sure CI is passing (type-check + lint)
• Double-check the PR description is filled out and the issue is linked
• Feel free to ask questions in Discussions if you need help

If you find DevTrack useful, a ⭐ star on the repo is always appreciated — it helps the project grow and attract more contributors!

[Priyanshu-byte-coder]

Thanks @Mohitswamii! The structure improvements (accessibility checklist, how-to-test guidance) are good additions to the template. However, there are a few issues:

1. The ## Summary section has been filled with content specific to this PR instead of remaining a generic placeholder. The template should say something like Brief description of what this PR does.
2. Closes #1107 is hardcoded — the template should keep Closes #<!-- issue number -->
3. The checklist items are pre-marked [x] — they should stay unchecked [ ] so contributors fill them out

Please update the template to keep these as generic, unfilled placeholders while keeping the structural improvements (accessibility section, additional notes, etc.).

[github-actions]

🎉 Merged! Thanks for contributing to DevTrack.

If the project has been useful to you, a ⭐ star on the repo is the easiest way to support it — it helps DevTrack get discovered by more developers.

Keep an eye on open issues for your next contribution!