revert(apps/gcp/prow/release): update Jenkins operator image tag to v20250105-d73428bb3 #1809
Conversation
v20250105-d73428bb3 revert commit d420a90
![ti-chi-bot[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/214286?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.
Summary:
This PR reverts the Jenkins operator image tag in the release.yaml file from v20251229-c8fca2457 back to v20250105-d73428bb3 by undoing commit d420a90. The change is straightforward, focusing on restoring a previous, presumably stable image version. The diff is minimal and clear, with no apparent issues in the YAML syntax.
Code Improvements
- Commit Message Clarity (Not in code but important):
- The PR description is minimal and could be improved by specifying why the revert is necessary (e.g., if the newer image caused issues).
- Suggested improvement:
Revert Jenkins operator image tag to v20250105-d73428bb3 due to stability issues found in v20251229-c8fca2457. This reverts commit d420a90. - This makes the intent clearer for future reviewers and maintainers.
Best Practices
- Context for Reverts:
- When reverting a commit, it is helpful to include a short explanation either in the PR description or in the commit message to help track the reason for the revert.
- This can prevent repeated mistakes and improve project documentation.
No critical issues or code errors were found. The YAML change is safe and straightforward.
Summary of ChangesHello @wuhuizuo, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request performs a targeted rollback of the Jenkins operator image tag within the Prow release configuration. By reverting a specific commit, it ensures that the Prow system utilizes an older, presumably more stable or desired, version of the Jenkins operator image, thereby addressing any potential issues or unintended behaviors introduced by the newer tag. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request has a critical inconsistency. While it is labeled as a revert of an update to a specific Jenkins operator image tag, the code change itself performs the update instead of reverting it. This could lead to deploying an unintended version. I have added a critical review comment to highlight this discrepancy, which needs to be resolved before this PR can be merged.
|
Rollback to check whether the origin commit introduced the wrong Jenkins CI status reporting issue. /approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: wuhuizuo The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
revert commit d420a90