Skip to content

Conversation

@wuhuizuo
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added area/apps env/GCP will deploy on GCP cluster labels Jan 12, 2026
Copy link
Contributor

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

Summary
This PR updates the deck container image tag in the apps/gcp/prow/release/release.yaml file from v20250905-a0cfed255 to v20260112-dc47abc00. The change is a straightforward configuration update to use a newer version of the deck image, presumably to pick up bug fixes or new features. The diff is minimal and focused, with no apparent code logic changes, making the update low risk.


Best Practices

  • Lack of PR Description

    • File: N/A (PR metadata)
    • Issue: The PR description is empty, which misses an opportunity to explain the reason for the image tag update (e.g., what fixes or improvements this new image contains).
    • Suggestion: Add a brief description summarizing the motivation for bumping the image tag and any relevant context or testing performed to verify the new image. This aids reviewers and future maintainers.
  • Version Tagging Strategy

    • File: apps/gcp/prow/release/release.yaml line 69
    • Issue: The version tag is a specific commit SHA combined with a date, which is good for traceability, but it would be helpful to confirm that this version is fully tested and stable before updating in production manifests.
    • Suggestion: Ensure that the new image tag corresponds to a tested and stable release, and consider documenting the image source or changelog link in the PR description or repo documentation.

No critical issues or code improvements are applicable given the sole change is an image tag update in a YAML config file.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @wuhuizuo, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on maintaining the Prow infrastructure by updating the deck component to a newer image version. This ensures that the Prow instance running on GCP utilizes the latest specified deck image, which may include important bug fixes, performance improvements, or new features, thereby keeping the CI/CD system up-to-date and robust.

Highlights

  • Prow Deck Image Update: The deck component's container image tag in the Prow release configuration has been updated.
  • Version Bump: The image tag for ghcr.io/ti-community-infra/prow/deck was changed from v20250905-a0cfed255 to v20260112-dc47abc00.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the size/XS label Jan 12, 2026
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the image tag for the Prow deck component. My review found that other related Prow components were not updated, which could lead to version inconsistencies. I've recommended updating all related components to the new tag to ensure compatibility and maintainability.

@wuhuizuo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/approve

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Jan 12, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: wuhuizuo

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the approved label Jan 12, 2026
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit 0e7ff1c into main Jan 12, 2026
5 checks passed
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot deleted the fix/bump-deck-image-to-fix-bad-mdl-links branch January 12, 2026 14:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants