Skip to content

mqtt: container should check for agent id in mirrored container#167

Merged
rcschrg merged 1 commit intodevelopmentfrom
fix_mqtt_agent_process
Apr 9, 2025
Merged

mqtt: container should check for agent id in mirrored container#167
rcschrg merged 1 commit intodevelopmentfrom
fix_mqtt_agent_process

Conversation

@maurerle
Copy link
Collaborator

@maurerle maurerle commented Apr 9, 2025

The mqtt container should check if the receiver ID exists in the mirrored container pass the message to it.

This also cleans up as_agent_process in tcp container, which is now handled in the core and only differs through _create_mirror_container.

Would like to merge this before #166

… and pass the message to it

clean up as_agent_process in tcp container
@maurerle maurerle requested a review from rcschrg April 9, 2025 07:41
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 9, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.15%. Comparing base (d3adc04) to head (76c70ad).
Report is 2 commits behind head on development.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##           development     #167      +/-   ##
===============================================
+ Coverage        89.13%   89.15%   +0.01%     
===============================================
  Files               22       22              
  Lines             2513     2507       -6     
===============================================
- Hits              2240     2235       -5     
+ Misses             273      272       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@rcschrg rcschrg merged commit 59eec23 into development Apr 9, 2025
10 checks passed
@maurerle maurerle deleted the fix_mqtt_agent_process branch April 9, 2025 16:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants