Skip to content

deepfilternet: 0.5.6 -> 0.5.6-unstable-2024-08-15, fix build#334835

Closed
Philipp-M wants to merge 1 commit into
NixOS:masterfrom
Philipp-M:deepfilternet-fix-build
Closed

deepfilternet: 0.5.6 -> 0.5.6-unstable-2024-08-15, fix build#334835
Philipp-M wants to merge 1 commit into
NixOS:masterfrom
Philipp-M:deepfilternet-fix-build

Conversation

@Philipp-M

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description of changes

See #332957 for more details, this updates it to the current git version and the local Cargo.lock and patches it, because otherwise the build still breaks (because of other issues).

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@ofborg ofborg Bot requested a review from ralismark August 15, 2024 12:08
@ofborg ofborg Bot added 10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-darwin: 1 This PR causes 1 package to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Linux. labels Aug 15, 2024
@alyssais

alyssais commented Aug 15, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

#334838 had a simpler approach — would it work?

cc @Mrmaxmeier

@Philipp-M

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Sure, I'm indifferent with either solution (as long as it doesn't break :))

};

postPatch = ''
ln --force -s ${./Cargo.lock} Cargo.lock

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
ln --force -s ${./Cargo.lock} Cargo.lock
ln -fs ${./Cargo.lock} Cargo.lock

@SuperSandro2000

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

because otherwise the build still breaks (because of other issues).

What other issues?

@SuperSandro2000

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closing in favor of #334838

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-darwin: 1 This PR causes 1 package to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Linux.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants