Skip to content

Change behavior of base_ring for Laurent polynomials#2356

Open
SoongNoonien wants to merge 1 commit intoNemocas:masterfrom
SoongNoonien:laurent_base_ring
Open

Change behavior of base_ring for Laurent polynomials#2356
SoongNoonien wants to merge 1 commit intoNemocas:masterfrom
SoongNoonien:laurent_base_ring

Conversation

@SoongNoonien
Copy link
Collaborator

Similar to #2182, this changes the behavior of base_ring for Laurent polynomials to return the underlying polynomial ring instead of the coefficient ring.

@SoongNoonien SoongNoonien added the release notes: use title For PRs: the title of this PR is suitable for direct use in the release notes label Feb 25, 2026
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 25, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 89.74359% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 88.20%. Comparing base (93cfa8c) to head (39d8217).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/LaurentMPoly.jl 71.42% 2 Missing ⚠️
src/LaurentPoly.jl 50.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
src/generic/LaurentMPoly.jl 92.30% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2356      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.21%   88.20%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         127      127              
  Lines       32847    32847              
==========================================
- Hits        28975    28974       -1     
- Misses       3872     3873       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

breaking release notes: use title For PRs: the title of this PR is suitable for direct use in the release notes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants