dgxie HA #44
Closed
dgxie HA #44
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
|
Will not implement for now due to custom fork |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
An attempt to add dgxie ha + horizontal scalability (rebirth of #43 )
Those changes/suggestions are linked the proposals in #41
I tried to do a PR on netboot near Google (danderson/netboot#84) to allow to run multiple pixiecore instances all able to check for valid nonces and I hope they will study why being able to provide an external key to pixiecore is not an option for serious deployments.
Another thing, I adapted the docker image build to a multistage one but using my netboot branch, I suggest you to fork netboot and add my fork as a remote to import my branch in your own repository.
Regards.