Skip to content

[MXFP8/FP4-param-gather] Post processing after forced param AG in eval#4562

Open
WanZzzzzz wants to merge 7 commits intoNVIDIA:mainfrom
WanZzzzzz:qiyu/param_gather_eval_fix_main
Open

[MXFP8/FP4-param-gather] Post processing after forced param AG in eval#4562
WanZzzzzz wants to merge 7 commits intoNVIDIA:mainfrom
WanZzzzzz:qiyu/param_gather_eval_fix_main

Conversation

@WanZzzzzz
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@WanZzzzzz WanZzzzzz commented Apr 30, 2026

What does this PR do ?

The same PR to dev has been merged: #4563
Fixes FP8/MXFP8/FP4 parameter-gather convergence when eval runs between training steps.

When eval disables forward pre-hooks, start_param_sync(force_sync=True) can complete parameter all-gather synchronously. In that path there is no async gather handle for the next train forward hook to wait on (line), so the usual post-all-gather processing was skipped in next train step. In eval, the post processing is also skipped if the job enables overlap_param_gather (line). With FP8 (blockwise scaling) or FP4 param gather, this can leave columnwise weight storage stale while rowwise storage has been refreshed, causing the next train backward to use staled weights. With MXFP8 param+reuse_grad_buff_for_mxfp8_param_ag, the AG'ed weights will not be copied(quantized) from param buffer to model weights, which is not correct.

In this PR we add post processing in bucket group's start_param_sync for synchronous gather, hence making sure the above cases are correctly handled.

Validated the fix on DSv3 proxy model pretraining for FP4 param gather:
image

⚠️ For major changes (either in lines of code or in its impact), please make sure to first share a design doc with the team. If you're unsure what's the best way to do so, contact the @mcore-oncall.

Issue tracking

For PRs from open-source community contributors:

  • New features: a linked issue is required. Please open a feature request and reference it here before submitting the PR.
  • Small updates (bug fixes, minor improvements): a linked issue is recommended and will accelerate the PR review process.

Linked issue:

Contribution process

Pre-checks

  • I have added relevant unit tests
  • I have added relevant functional tests
  • I have added proper typing to my code Typing guidelines
  • I have added relevant documentation
  • I have run the autoformatter.sh on my PR

Code review

Feel free to message or comment the @mcore-oncall to help accelerate your merge into main. The less complex your PR is, the faster it will be approved and merged!

All PRs start as draft. If you open a non-draft PR, it will be automatically converted to draft.

Step 1: Mark PR as "Ready for Review"

  1. When your PR is ready, click Ready for Review.
  2. An oncall reviewer is auto-assigned and expert reviewers are notified based on your changes.
    • Some PRs may jump straight to step 2. This is determined by .github/CODEOWNERS.

⚠️ Only mark as ready once merge-conflicts are resolved and the CI is passing.
Final Review might get declined if these requirements are not fulfilled.

Step 2: Final Review

For PRs that change megatron/core, once all expert reviewers have approved, the Final Review label is applied automatically and final reviewers are assigned.

For PRs outside megatron/core, this step is skipped.

Step 3: Approved

Once all required reviewers have approved, the Approved label is applied automatically.

Merge

Any member of mcore-engineers will be able to merge your PR.

For MRs into `dev` branch The proposed review process for `dev` branch is under active discussion.

MRs are mergable after one approval by either eharper@nvidia.com or zijiey@nvidia.com.

Signed-off-by: qiyuw <qiyuw@nvidia.com>
@WanZzzzzz WanZzzzzz requested review from a team as code owners April 30, 2026 20:19
@copy-pr-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

copy-pr-bot Bot commented Apr 30, 2026

This pull request requires additional validation before any workflows can run on NVIDIA's runners.

Pull request vetters can view their responsibilities here.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

@svcnvidia-nemo-ci svcnvidia-nemo-ci marked this pull request as draft April 30, 2026 20:19
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR has been automatically converted to draft because all PRs must start as drafts.

When you are ready for review, click Ready for Review to begin the review process. This will:

  1. Add the oncall reviewer (optional reviewer)
  2. Add required review teams based on your changes

See the contribution guide for more details.

@WanZzzzzz WanZzzzzz marked this pull request as ready for review April 30, 2026 20:31
@svcnvidia-nemo-ci svcnvidia-nemo-ci added the Final Review PR is in the "final review" stage label Apr 30, 2026
@svcnvidia-nemo-ci svcnvidia-nemo-ci requested a review from a team April 30, 2026 20:32
WanZzzzzz added 6 commits May 8, 2026 11:13
Signed-off-by: qiyuw <qiyuw@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: qiyuw <qiyuw@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: qiyuw <qiyuw@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: qiyuw <qiyuw@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: qiyuw <qiyuw@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: qiyuw <qiyuw@nvidia.com>
@WanZzzzzz WanZzzzzz changed the title Update colwise data after synced param AG [MXFP8/FP4-param-gather] Post processing after forced param AG in eval May 8, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

complexity: low Final Review PR is in the "final review" stage

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants