chore: Removes all contributors content from readme

[kellijohnson-NOAA]

What is the feature?

• Remove the list of all contributors from the README because we have the same list on our website and users can go to the insights to see who has committed.

How have you implemented the solution?

• Remove the workflow and remove the section from the README.
• Removed authors from vignettes so their names do not have to be stored
• Removed GitHub handles and names from WORDLIST
• Removed GitHub handles from a few comments

Does the PR impact any other area of the project, maybe another repo?

• The spell check is currently failing on main, that failure will go away with this PR b/c the failures are due to names.

close #1375

@peterkuriyama-NOAA let me know if you do not have time to review this PR.

---

Instructions for code reviewer

👋Hello reviewer👋, thank you for taking the time to review this PR!

• Please use this checklist during your review, checking off items that you have verified are complete but feel free to skip over items that are not relevant!
• See the GitHub documentation for how to comment on a PR to indicate where you have questions or changes are needed before approving the PR.
• Please use standard conventional messages for both commit messages and comments
• PR reviews are a great way to learn so feel free to share your tips and tricks. However, when suggesting changes to the PR that are optional please include nit: (for nitpicking) as the comment type. For example, nit: I prefer using a data.frame() instead of a matrix because ...
• Engage with the developer. Make it clear when the PR is approved by selecting the approved status, and potentially commenting on the PR with something like This PR is now ready to be merged.

Checklist

• The code is well-designed
• The code is designed well for both users and developers
• Code coverage remains high- [ ] Comments are clear, useful, and explain why instead of what
• Code is appropriately documented (doxygen and roxygen)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 87.39%. Comparing base (9448266) to head (1311c2e).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1551   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   87.39%   87.39%           
=======================================
  Files          97       97           
  Lines        8746     8746           
  Branches      519      520    +1     
=======================================
  Hits         7644     7644           
+ Misses       1065     1064    -1     
- Partials       37       38    +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[peterkuriyama-NOAA]

A couple comments in the inst/WORDLIST. I'm not sure what the function of this file is (maybe a kind of index?)

[kellijohnson-NOAA]

Thank you Peter for the review. The WORDLIST file is used for cspell, which checks the spelling within certain files.