Update SECURITY.md#45
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)Reviewer's GuideRefactors SECURITY.md to use a simplified, standardized security policy format that marks all versions as supported and adds a brief vulnerability reporting section. File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
|
View changes in DiffLens |
✅ Deploy Preview for lsngames ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
Review Summary by QodoRestructure SECURITY.md with markdown formatting
WalkthroughsDescription• Restructured SECURITY.md with markdown formatting • Changed version support table to markdown format • Simplified version support to show all versions supported • Added vulnerability reporting section with link Diagramflowchart LR
A["Old SECURITY.md<br/>Plain text format<br/>Multiple versions listed"] -- "Restructure" --> B["New SECURITY.md<br/>Markdown format<br/>All versions supported<br/>Vulnerability reporting added"]
File Changes1. SECURITY.md
|
|
View changes in DiffLens |
Code Review by Qodo
1. Public vuln reporting path
|
📝 WalkthroughSummary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughThis PR restructures the SECURITY.md file to follow a standard security policy format. The document now includes dedicated sections for "Supported Versions" (presented as a Markdown table indicating all versions are supported) and "Reporting a Vulnerability" (with updated guidance directing to "Issues Report a Vulnerability"), replacing the previous version-by-version support matrix. ChangesSecurity Policy Document Restructure
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
✨ Simplify code
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
View changes in DiffLens |
PR Summary
|
![codescene-delta-analysis[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/53921?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No application code in the PR — skipped Code Health checks.
See analysis details in CodeScene
Quality Gate Profile: Pay Down Tech Debt
Install CodeScene MCP: safeguard and uplift AI-generated code. Catch issues early with our IDE extension and CLI tool.
Not up to standards ⛔🔴 Issues
|
| Category | Results |
|---|---|
| BestPractice | 1 minor |
NEW Get contextual insights on your PRs based on Codacy's metrics, along with PR and Jira context, without leaving GitHub. Enable AI reviewer
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey - I've found 1 issue
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:
## Individual Comments
### Comment 1
<location path="SECURITY.md" line_range="11" />
<code_context>
+
+## Reporting a Vulnerability
+
+Go to Issues Report a Vulnerability
</code_context>
<issue_to_address>
**suggestion (typo):** Clarify the vulnerability reporting instruction sentence.
The wording reads incomplete. Please rephrase to make the steps explicit, e.g. "Go to **Issues > Report a vulnerability**" or "Go to Issues and select **Report a vulnerability**" so the instruction is grammatically clear.
</issue_to_address>Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
|
|
||
| ## Reporting a Vulnerability | ||
|
|
||
| Go to Issues Report a Vulnerability |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (typo): Clarify the vulnerability reporting instruction sentence.
The wording reads incomplete. Please rephrase to make the steps explicit, e.g. "Go to Issues > Report a vulnerability" or "Go to Issues and select Report a vulnerability" so the instruction is grammatically clear.
![devin-ai-integration[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/811515?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
|
||
| ## Reporting a Vulnerability | ||
|
|
||
| Go to Issues Report a Vulnerability |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📝 Info: Vulnerability reporting instructions lack actionable link or detail
The new vulnerability reporting text at line 11 reads Go to Issues Report a Vulnerability, which is vague — it doesn't include an actual URL, a link to the GitHub Issues tab, or instructions on how to privately report a vulnerability. The previous version also lacked this detail, but since the section is being rewritten, it would be worth making this actionable (e.g., linking to the repo's Issues page or using GitHub's private vulnerability reporting feature).
Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.
 |
|
Overall Grade |
Security Reliability Complexity Hygiene |
Code Review Summary
| Analyzer | Status | Updated (UTC) | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| JavaScript |  |
May 24, 2026 12:43a.m. | Review ↗ |
| Python | |
May 24, 2026 12:43a.m. | Review ↗ |
| Rust | |
May 24, 2026 12:43a.m. | Review ↗ |
| Secrets | |
May 24, 2026 12:43a.m. | Review ↗ |
| Ruby | |
May 24, 2026 12:43a.m. | Review ↗ |
| Shell | |
May 24, 2026 12:43a.m. | Review ↗ |
| Scala | |
May 24, 2026 12:43a.m. | Review ↗ |
| SQL | |
May 24, 2026 12:43a.m. | Review ↗ |
| Terraform | |
May 24, 2026 12:43a.m. | Review ↗ |
| Code coverage |  |
May 24, 2026 12:43a.m. | Review ↗ |
| Swift | |
May 24, 2026 12:43a.m. | Review ↗ |
| C & C++ | |
May 24, 2026 12:43a.m. | Review ↗ |
| C# | |
May 24, 2026 12:43a.m. | Review ↗ |
| Ansible | |
May 24, 2026 12:43a.m. | Review ↗ |
Important
AI Review is run only on demand for your team. We're only showing results of static analysis review right now. To trigger AI Review, comment @deepsourcebot review on this thread.
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request updates the SECURITY.md file to a new format, simplifying the supported versions table and adding a section for reporting vulnerabilities. A review comment suggests improving the reporting instructions by providing a clearer path to the repository's Security tab, as the current text is incomplete and lacks a functional link.
|
|
||
| ## Reporting a Vulnerability | ||
|
|
||
| Go to Issues Report a Vulnerability |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The instruction for reporting a vulnerability is incomplete and lacks a functional link. It is recommended to provide a clear path, such as a link to the repository's security advisories page, to ensure that security issues are reported through the appropriate channels.
| Go to Issues Report a Vulnerability | |
| Please report vulnerabilities via the Security tab of this repository. |
Code Review SummaryStatus: No Issues Found | Recommendation: Merge Files Reviewed (1 file)
Reviewed by laguna-m.1-20260312:free · 116,984 tokens |
![qodo-code-review[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/484649?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| ## Reporting a Vulnerability | ||
|
|
||
| Go to Issues Report a Vulnerability |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
1. Public vuln reporting path 🐞 Bug ⛨ Security
SECURITY.md’s only reporting guidance is the malformed text “Go to Issues Report a Vulnerability” and it does not provide a private disclosure channel, which can lead to public vulnerability disclosure. This makes responsible disclosure hard/impossible for reporters to follow.
Agent Prompt
## Issue description
`SECURITY.md` currently provides an incomplete instruction (“Go to Issues Report a Vulnerability”) and does not include a private disclosure mechanism. This can cause reporters to file public issues for security vulnerabilities.
## Issue Context
The repository surfaces GitHub Issues prominently, so directing security reports to “Issues” is risky without explicit private-reporting guidance.
## Fix Focus Areas
- SECURITY.md[9-11]
## Suggested change
Update the “Reporting a Vulnerability” section to include a private reporting path (and make it an actual link), e.g.:
- Direct users to GitHub’s private vulnerability reporting: `Security` tab → `Report a vulnerability` (or link to the repository’s `/security/advisories/new` page).
- Optionally include a security contact email and an expectation for acknowledgement/response timelines.
- Explicitly state: “Please do not open a public GitHub issue for security vulnerabilities.”
ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@SECURITY.md`:
- Around line 5-7: Update SECURITY.md to replace the ambiguous "All" entry in
the supported-versions table with the actual supported version range or a clear
justification that every historical release is supported (edit the table header
"Version | Supported" and the row currently showing "All | :white_check_mark:"),
and correct the vulnerability reporting instructions by adding a clear, linked
action (for example "Report a Vulnerability" linking to the Issues page or a
dedicated security contact) and explicit steps for reporters; ensure both
changes are concise, factual, and preserve the existing table and reporting
section structure.
- Line 11: Replace the ambiguous line "Go to Issues Report a Vulnerability" with
a clear, formatted set of instructions that specifies the exact reporting path
and options: e.g., provide three distinct bulletized options titled "Report via
GitHub private vulnerability reporting", "Report via Issues", and "Report via
Security tab", each containing the precise UI action to take (e.g., "Open this
repository's Issues tab → New issue → choose 'Report a vulnerability' template"
or "Navigate to the Security tab → Report a vulnerability"), and ensure the
original phrase is removed and the new text uses proper markdown
headings/bullets and a link to a preferred contact (email or security policy)
for sensitive reports.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 1d357ffc-c9b4-49c3-b0b1-fca1c68bcde2
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
SECURITY.md
📜 Review details
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
- GitHub Check: semgrep-cloud-platform/scan
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
- GitHub Check: Kilo Code Review
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
SECURITY.md
[notice] 1-1: SECURITY.md#L1
Expected: [None]; Actual: # Security Policy
| | Version | Supported | | ||
| | ------- | ------------------ | | ||
| | All | :white_check_mark: | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❓ Verification inconclusive
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for version tags and release history to verify if claiming "All" versions are supported is appropriate.
# Check for version tags
echo "=== Version tags in repository ==="
git tag -l | grep -E '^v?[0-9]+\.[0-9]+' | sort -V | tail -20
echo -e "\n=== Recent releases ==="
gh release list --limit 10
echo -e "\n=== Check for version file ==="
fd -t f 'version|VERSION' | head -10Repository: LCSOGthb/Games
Length of output: 150
Clarify “All versions supported” in SECURITY.md (and fix reporting instruction clarity)
The SECURITY.md supported-versions table now declares “All” versions as supported, which is a large security-policy change; the earlier version-specific ranges no longer appear. Repo inspection for version tags/releases/version files returned no usable indicators so far, so it’s not possible to tell whether “All” is intentional or overstated—please update the table to reflect the actual supported version/range policy (or document why every historical version is covered).
Also, the vulnerability reporting instruction (“Go to Issues Report a Vulnerability”) is still unclear and missing obvious formatting/linkage.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@SECURITY.md` around lines 5 - 7, Update SECURITY.md to replace the ambiguous
"All" entry in the supported-versions table with the actual supported version
range or a clear justification that every historical release is supported (edit
the table header "Version | Supported" and the row currently showing "All |
:white_check_mark:"), and correct the vulnerability reporting instructions by
adding a clear, linked action (for example "Report a Vulnerability" linking to
the Issues page or a dedicated security contact) and explicit steps for
reporters; ensure both changes are concise, factual, and preserve the existing
table and reporting section structure.
|
|
||
| ## Reporting a Vulnerability | ||
|
|
||
| Go to Issues Report a Vulnerability |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Clarify the vulnerability reporting instructions.
The current instruction "Go to Issues Report a Vulnerability" is ambiguous and lacks proper formatting. It's unclear whether this refers to a GitHub tab, a button, or a specific workflow.
📝 Suggested improvements
Option 1: If using GitHub's private vulnerability reporting feature:
-Go to Issues Report a Vulnerability
+To report a vulnerability, please use GitHub's [private vulnerability reporting feature](https://github.com/LCSOGthb/Games/security/advisories/new).Option 2: If reporting via Issues:
-Go to Issues Report a Vulnerability
+Please report vulnerabilities by [creating a new issue](https://github.com/LCSOGthb/Games/issues/new) with the "Report a Vulnerability" template.Option 3: If directing to the Security tab:
-Go to Issues Report a Vulnerability
+To report a vulnerability, navigate to the [Security](https://github.com/LCSOGthb/Games/security) tab and click "Report a vulnerability".🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@SECURITY.md` at line 11, Replace the ambiguous line "Go to Issues Report a
Vulnerability" with a clear, formatted set of instructions that specifies the
exact reporting path and options: e.g., provide three distinct bulletized
options titled "Report via GitHub private vulnerability reporting", "Report via
Issues", and "Report via Security tab", each containing the precise UI action to
take (e.g., "Open this repository's Issues tab → New issue → choose 'Report a
vulnerability' template" or "Navigate to the Security tab → Report a
vulnerability"), and ensure the original phrase is removed and the new text uses
proper markdown headings/bullets and a link to a preferred contact (email or
security policy) for sensitive reports.
1 participant
Summary by Sourcery
Update the documented security support policy and vulnerability reporting instructions in SECURITY.md.
Documentation: