Open
Conversation
1 task
| SDC allows a <<vol1_spec_sdpi_p_actor_somds_consumer>> to open multiple, concurrent TCP | ||
| connections to a <<vol1_spec_sdpi_p_actor_somds_provider>>'s hosted services. | ||
| While this offers flexibility for implementations, <<vol1_spec_sdpi_p_actor_somds_provider>> | ||
| may constrain the number of concurrent TCP connections to ensure availability of its |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please use increase/improve over ensure.
Collaborator
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Increase/improve doesn't really sound right to me either because it implies availability is an aspirational goal that isn't being reached. Was there a specific reason you were keen on "increase" or "improve"? How about "… to help mitigate risks to availability of its system function contribution"?
asciidoc/volume2/concurrent-connections/tf2-ch-a-mdpws-concurrent-connections.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| ** <<term_transport_address>> and/or, | ||
| ** `[source endpoint]` message property (see <<ref_oasis_ws_addressing_2006>>) and/or, | ||
| ** client credentials used for TLS authentication. | ||
| * Securing the connection may be the most expensive part of an operation, so a <<vol1_spec_sdpi_p_actor_somds_provider>> may |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What does "operation" refer to here?
Collaborator
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hmm. A soap request/response for mdpws. Annex B in 20701 uses the term "operations". Maybe "SDC service operation" is clearer?
asciidoc/volume2/concurrent-connections/tf2-ch-a-mdpws-concurrent-connections.adoc
Show resolved
Hide resolved
asciidoc/volume2/concurrent-connections/tf2-ch-a-mdpws-concurrent-connections.adoc
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…'t add any value. Tweaked wording of introduction to improve clarity and avoid "ensure". Removed repetition of motivation in R0201; its already in the intro and makes more sense there. Clarified operation => SDC service operation (language from annex B of 20701). Added change log entry.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📑 Description
Not all providers can support many concurrent consumer connections while some consumers and/or providers may benefit from multiple concurrent connections to mitigate risks. This PR outlines an approach, leveraging the HTTP 429 status code, to support interoperability for both scenarios.
☑ Mandatory Tasks
The following aspects have been respected by the pull request assignee and at least one reviewer: