Update WS-POL post-merge memory

[Abiorh001]

Summary

Updates durable loop memory after PR #69 merged:

• marks WS-POL-001-08 as merged through PR Implement Celery project setup pipeline #69
• records review/evidence links and merge SHA
• clears active chunk state
• updates work queue, decisions, and risks for the Celery project setup merge

Validation

• python3 scripts/check_loop_memory_state.py
• python3 scripts/check_stale_workstream_wording.py
• python3 scripts/check_markdown_links.py
• git diff --check

No product/runtime code changes.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation

  • Clarified the setup and submission workflow, including when project setup starts automatically and what happens before a draft policy is created.
  • Updated status notes to show the latest work items as merged and that no implementation chunk is currently active.

• Chores

  • Refined internal tracking for review history, risks, and next-step guidance to better reflect the current release state.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@Abiorh001, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 56 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: fd1477f4-4e9e-4ffc-b0aa-59db667d5621

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d85a32b and 3ab4fc7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-POL-001-submission-artifact-policy-foundation/reviews/WS-POL-001-08-post-merge-memory-internal-review-evidence.md

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Documentation-only update to .agent-loop tracking files marking WS-POL-001-08 as merged via PR #69. Updates loop state, work queue, review log, and initiative status/decisions/risks docs to clear the active chunk, add merged-chunk review log entries, and record Celery-based automatic project setup semantics.

Changes

WS-POL-001-08 Merge Documentation Update

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Loop state transition .agent-loop/LOOP_STATE.md	Current state, operating rule, and last review state sections updated to reflect PR #69 merge (aea7024) into main and no active chunk pending explicit start.
Review log entries .agent-loop/REVIEW_LOG.md	New sections appended for WS-POL-001-04 through WS-POL-001-08 recording merge PRs, reviewer tracks, PASS results, and scope.
Work queue next-chunk update .agent-loop/WORK_QUEUE.md	Planned Next replaced with a TBD placeholder; Proposed Next lists chunks 05-08 as merged and describes validating the Celery automatic setup path as the likely next step.
Initiative decisions, risks, and status .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-POL-001-submission-artifact-policy-foundation/DECISIONS.md, .../RISKS.md, .../STATUS.md	Clarifies discard-only construction-state fields, Celery pipeline ordering and draft policy creation, updated risk mitigations, and chunk status/blockers reflecting merged chunks and no active work.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• Flow-Research/workstream#26: Updates the same DECISIONS.md and STATUS.md submission-artifact-policy docs that this PR further progresses.
• Flow-Research/workstream#27: Updates the same LOOP_STATE.md, WORK_QUEUE.md, and initiative STATUS.md files to advance chunk/gate state after a merge.

Suggested reviewers: abiorh-claw

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	⚠️ Warning	The description only includes Summary and Validation; it omits most required template sections like Chunk, Goals, Evidence, and reviewer results.	Add the missing template sections, including chunk and goal context, what changed and why, evidence, acceptance criteria, reviewer results, risks, and merge ownership.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title matches the main change: updating durable loop memory after the WS-POL-001-08 merge.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch codex/ws-pol-001-post-merge-memory

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}