[Onyx Audit] Migrate keys to RAM-only part 3/3#86660
Draft
JKobrynski wants to merge 1 commit intoExpensify:mainfrom
Draft
[Onyx Audit] Migrate keys to RAM-only part 3/3#86660JKobrynski wants to merge 1 commit intoExpensify:mainfrom
JKobrynski wants to merge 1 commit intoExpensify:mainfrom
Conversation
…tWithStoredValues, add initial state
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
…tWithStoredValues, add initial state
Explanation of Change
Coming from this comment. The main goal of this PR is to remove
initWithStoredValuesfrom keys that turned out to be more problematic than anticipated during migration part 1. At the moment, it's about migrating the following keys:IS_CHECKING_PUBLIC_ROOMDisclaimer:
"Migration" doesn't mean that keys need to be migrated to RAM-only, it means we should remove
initWithStoredValuesparam from their calls and consider whether or not they should be migrated or not (and apply adjustments if necessary to maintain functionality).Fixed Issues
$ #80091
PROPOSAL: N/A
Tests
1. App Launch (no deep link)
2. Deep link to a public room — logged out
new-expensify://r/<publicRoomReportID>)3. Deep link to a public room — logged in
4. Deep link to a private room — logged out
5. Deep link to a report — logged in
6. Offline behavior
7. Sign out and sign back in
8. HybridApp (if applicable)
Offline tests
QA Steps
Same as Tests section above
PR Author Checklist
### Fixed Issuessection aboveTestssectionOffline stepssectionQA stepssectiontoggleReportand notonIconClick)src/languages/*files and using the translation methodSTYLE.md) were followedAvatar, I verified the components usingAvatarare working as expected)StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))npm run compress-svg)Avataris modified, I verified thatAvataris working as expected in all cases)Designlabel and/or tagged@Expensify/designso the design team can review the changes.ScrollViewcomponent to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.mainbranch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to theTeststeps.Screenshots/Videos
Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari