feat: Migrate to uv and switch to dynamic versioning

[Diapolo10]

[Pull request title here]

Description

Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed. Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change.

Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• This change requires a documentation update

How has this been tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

• Test A
• Test B

Test Configuration:

• Firmware version:
• Hardware:
• Toolchain:
• SDK:

Checklist

• My code follows the style guidelines of this project
• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• My changes generate no new warnings
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
• Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
5 Security Hotspots

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 70.58824% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 83.84%. Comparing base (ba5bfd3) to head (4fea016).
⚠️ Report is 42 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/escapyde/ansi.py	64.28%	5 Missing ⚠️

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (ba5bfd3) and HEAD (4fea016). Click for more details.

HEAD has 3 uploads less than BASE

Flag	BASE (ba5bfd3)	HEAD (4fea016)
unittests	18	15

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #413       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   94.28%   83.84%   -10.44%     
===========================================
  Files           8        5        -3     
  Lines         210      130       -80     
  Branches        0       19       +19     
===========================================
- Hits          198      109       -89     
  Misses         12       12               
- Partials        0        9        +9     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	83.84% <70.58%> (-10.44%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.