Skip to content

omnibus: bzip2: ensure the destination folder exists#43346

Closed
chouquette wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
chouquette/bzip2_pc_fixup
Closed

omnibus: bzip2: ensure the destination folder exists#43346
chouquette wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
chouquette/bzip2_pc_fixup

Conversation

@chouquette
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Ensures the pkgconfig destination folder exists before attempting to write to it

Motivation

Fixing build failures when it doesn't

Describe how you validated your changes

Without the change: https://gitlab.ddbuild.io/DataDog/datadog-agent/-/jobs/1250462709
With the change: https://gitlab.ddbuild.io/DataDog/datadog-agent/-/jobs/1250597665

Additional Notes

This started occurring because the branch migrating python to bazel dropped libffi which was creating the destination folder indirectly, causing bzip2 to be built before any other software that would attempt to create a .pc file.

@chouquette chouquette requested a review from a team as a code owner November 21, 2025 14:06
@chouquette chouquette added changelog/no-changelog No changelog entry needed qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation team/agent-build ask-review Ask required teams to review this PR labels Nov 21, 2025
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly label Nov 21, 2025
# The version of bzip2 we use doesn't create a pkgconfig file,
# we add it here manually (needed at least by the Python build)
block do
FileUtils.mkdir_p "#{install_dir}/embedded/lib/pkgconfig/"
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Doesn't plain old mkdir work? I've seen it in other files?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added medium review PR review might take time and removed short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly labels Nov 21, 2025
@cit-pr-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: 3a624610-7fda-4d98-b00f-0bf630cf0ad5

Baseline: b8940b3
Comparison: dc3845f
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Experiments ignored for regressions

Regressions in experiments with settings containing erratic: true are ignored.

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
docker_containers_cpu % cpu utilization -1.59 [-4.52, +1.34] 1 Logs

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization +4.48 [+2.95, +6.00] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
ddot_metrics memory utilization +0.87 [+0.67, +1.07] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization +0.12 [+0.07, +0.16] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput +0.02 [-0.03, +0.07] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_v3 ingress throughput +0.01 [-0.12, +0.13] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput +0.01 [-0.07, +0.08] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_20mb_12k_contexts_20_senders memory utilization +0.01 [-0.04, +0.05] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.13, +0.13] 1 Logs
file_tree memory utilization -0.02 [-0.07, +0.02] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput -0.04 [-0.45, +0.37] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput -0.04 [-0.46, +0.37] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput -0.04 [-0.41, +0.33] 1 Logs
ddot_metrics_sum_delta memory utilization -0.18 [-0.38, +0.02] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle memory utilization -0.23 [-0.27, -0.18] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
otlp_ingest_logs memory utilization -0.24 [-0.32, -0.16] 1 Logs
ddot_metrics_sum_cumulativetodelta_exporter memory utilization -0.24 [-0.48, +0.00] 1 Logs
otlp_ingest_metrics memory utilization -0.27 [-0.41, -0.13] 1 Logs
ddot_metrics_sum_cumulative memory utilization -0.29 [-0.44, -0.14] 1 Logs
ddot_logs memory utilization -0.31 [-0.37, -0.25] 1 Logs
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput -0.32 [-0.39, -0.24] 1 Logs
quality_gate_metrics_logs memory utilization -1.04 [-1.24, -0.84] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
docker_containers_cpu % cpu utilization -1.59 [-4.52, +1.34] 1 Logs
docker_containers_memory memory utilization -1.63 [-1.79, -1.47] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
docker_containers_cpu simple_check_run 10/10
docker_containers_memory memory_usage 10/10
docker_containers_memory simple_check_run 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
quality_gate_idle intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs lost_bytes 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs cpu_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs lost_bytes 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Static quality checks

✅ Please find below the results from static quality gates
Comparison made with ancestor b8940b3

Successful checks

Info

Quality gate Delta On disk size (MiB) Delta On wire size (MiB)
agent_deb_amd64 $${-0}$$ $${704.9}$$ < $${717.44}$$ $${+0.02}$$ $${172.49}$$ < $${177.37}$$
agent_deb_amd64_fips $${0}$$ $${698.94}$$ < $${711.66}$$ $${+0.01}$$ $${171.27}$$ < $${174.84}$$
agent_heroku_amd64 $${-0}$$ $${327.31}$$ < $${337.57}$$ $${-0}$$ $${87.35}$$ < $${90.78}$$
agent_msi $${-0}$$ $${999.64}$$ < $${1015.38}$$ $${+0}$$ $${144.4}$$ < $${149.42}$$
agent_rpm_amd64 $${-0}$$ $${704.89}$$ < $${717.41}$$ $${+0.03}$$ $${175.71}$$ < $${178.01}$$
agent_rpm_amd64_fips $${0}$$ $${698.93}$$ < $${711.64}$$ $${-0.01}$$ $${173.34}$$ < $${177.26}$$
agent_rpm_arm64 $${0}$$ $${690.2}$$ < $${702.19}$$ $${+0.04}$$ $${159.5}$$ < $${163.22}$$
agent_rpm_arm64_fips $${0}$$ $${685.39}$$ < $${697.6}$$ $${-0.01}$$ $${158.77}$$ < $${162.68}$$
agent_suse_amd64 $${-0}$$ $${704.89}$$ < $${717.41}$$ $${+0.03}$$ $${175.71}$$ < $${178.01}$$
agent_suse_amd64_fips $${0}$$ $${698.93}$$ < $${711.64}$$ $${-0.01}$$ $${173.34}$$ < $${177.26}$$
agent_suse_arm64 $${0}$$ $${690.2}$$ < $${702.19}$$ $${+0.04}$$ $${159.5}$$ < $${163.22}$$
agent_suse_arm64_fips $${0}$$ $${685.39}$$ < $${697.6}$$ $${-0.01}$$ $${158.77}$$ < $${162.68}$$
docker_agent_amd64 $${+0}$$ $${767.28}$$ < $${769.92}$$ $${+0.01}$$ $${260.35}$$ < $${261.52}$$
docker_agent_arm64 $${0}$$ $${776.94}$$ < $${779.46}$$ $${-0}$$ $${250.59}$$ < $${251.72}$$
docker_agent_jmx_amd64 $${+0}$$ $${958.16}$$ < $${960.8}$$ $${+0.01}$$ $${328.98}$$ < $${330.15}$$
docker_agent_jmx_arm64 $${+0}$$ $${956.41}$$ < $${958.93}$$ $${+0.01}$$ $${315.21}$$ < $${316.35}$$
docker_cluster_agent_amd64 $${-0}$$ $${179.2}$$ < $${207.49}$$ $${+0}$$ $${63.23}$$ < $${70.2}$$
docker_cluster_agent_arm64 $${-0}$$ $${196.75}$$ < $${223.38}$$ $${-0}$$ $${59.96}$$ < $${66.42}$$
docker_cws_instrumentation_amd64 $${0}$$ $${7.07}$$ < $${7.12}$$ $${+0}$$ $${2.95}$$ < $${3.29}$$
docker_cws_instrumentation_arm64 $${+0}$$ $${6.69}$$ < $${6.92}$$ $${0}$$ $${2.7}$$ < $${3.07}$$
docker_dogstatsd_amd64 $${0}$$ $${38.54}$$ < $${39.3}$$ $${+0}$$ $${14.9}$$ < $${15.76}$$
docker_dogstatsd_arm64 $${0}$$ $${37.24}$$ < $${37.94}$$ $${0}$$ $${14.34}$$ < $${14.83}$$
dogstatsd_deb_amd64 $${0}$$ $${29.76}$$ < $${30.53}$$ $${-0}$$ $${7.86}$$ < $${8.75}$$
dogstatsd_deb_arm64 $${0}$$ $${28.28}$$ < $${29.11}$$ $${+0}$$ $${6.79}$$ < $${7.71}$$
dogstatsd_rpm_amd64 $${0}$$ $${29.76}$$ < $${30.53}$$ $${+0}$$ $${7.87}$$ < $${8.76}$$
dogstatsd_suse_amd64 $${0}$$ $${29.76}$$ < $${30.53}$$ $${+0}$$ $${7.87}$$ < $${8.76}$$
iot_agent_deb_amd64 $${0}$$ $${42.38}$$ < $${43.19}$$ $${-0}$$ $${11.07}$$ < $${11.98}$$
iot_agent_deb_arm64 $${0}$$ $${40.13}$$ < $${40.92}$$ $${-0}$$ $${9.53}$$ < $${10.45}$$
iot_agent_deb_armhf $${0}$$ $${40.05}$$ < $${40.86}$$ $${-0}$$ $${9.64}$$ < $${10.56}$$
iot_agent_rpm_amd64 $${0}$$ $${42.38}$$ < $${43.19}$$ $${+0}$$ $${11.09}$$ < $${12.0}$$
iot_agent_suse_amd64 $${0}$$ $${42.38}$$ < $${43.19}$$ $${+0}$$ $${11.09}$$ < $${12.0}$$

@gh-worker-devtools-f43747 gh-worker-devtools-f43747 Bot deleted the chouquette/bzip2_pc_fixup branch May 23, 2026 03:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ask-review Ask required teams to review this PR changelog/no-changelog No changelog entry needed medium review PR review might take time qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation team/agent-build

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants