Skip to content

[CU-86b4umhm1] Update dependency pyjwt to v2.12.0 [SECURITY]#159

Open
dnastack-renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
renovate/pypi-pyjwt-vulnerability
Open

[CU-86b4umhm1] Update dependency pyjwt to v2.12.0 [SECURITY]#159
dnastack-renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
renovate/pypi-pyjwt-vulnerability

Conversation

@dnastack-renovate
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dnastack-renovate dnastack-renovate bot commented Mar 14, 2026 •
edited
Loading

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
pyjwt 2.10.1 → 2.12.0 age adoption passing confidence

GitHub Vulnerability Alerts

CVE-2026-32597

Summary

PyJWT does not validate the crit (Critical) Header Parameter defined in
RFC 7515 §4.1.11. When a JWS token contains a crit array listing
extensions that PyJWT does not understand, the library accepts the token
instead of rejecting it. This violates the MUST requirement in the RFC.

This is the same class of vulnerability as CVE-2025-59420 (Authlib),
which received CVSS 7.5 (HIGH).

RFC Requirement

RFC 7515 §4.1.11:

The "crit" (Critical) Header Parameter indicates that extensions to this
specification and/or [JWA] are being used that MUST be understood and
processed. [...] If any of the listed extension Header Parameters are
not understood and supported by the recipient, then the JWS is invalid.

Proof of Concept

import jwt  # PyJWT 2.8.0
import hmac, hashlib, base64, json

# Construct token with unknown critical extension
header = {"alg": "HS256", "crit": ["x-custom-policy"], "x-custom-policy": "require-mfa"}
payload = {"sub": "attacker", "role": "admin"}

def b64url(data):
    return base64.urlsafe_b64encode(data).rstrip(b"=").decode()

h = b64url(json.dumps(header, separators=(",", ":")).encode())
p = b64url(json.dumps(payload, separators=(",", ":")).encode())
sig = b64url(hmac.new(b"secret", f"{h}.{p}".encode(), hashlib.sha256).digest())
token = f"{h}.{p}.{sig}"

# Should REJECT — x-custom-policy is not understood by PyJWT
try:
    result = jwt.decode(token, "secret", algorithms=["HS256"])
    print(f"ACCEPTED: {result}")
    # Output: ACCEPTED: {'sub': 'attacker', 'role': 'admin'}
except Exception as e:
    print(f"REJECTED: {e}")

Expected: jwt.exceptions.InvalidTokenError: Unsupported critical extension: x-custom-policy
Actual: Token accepted, payload returned.

Comparison with RFC-compliant library

# jwcrypto — correctly rejects
from jwcrypto import jwt as jw_jwt, jwk
key = jwk.JWK(kty="oct", k=b64url(b"secret"))
jw_jwt.JWT(jwt=token, key=key, algs=["HS256"])

# raises: InvalidJWSObject('Unknown critical header: "x-custom-policy"')

Impact

  • Split-brain verification in mixed-library deployments (e.g., API
    gateway using jwcrypto rejects, backend using PyJWT accepts)
  • Security policy bypass when crit carries enforcement semantics
    (MFA, token binding, scope restrictions)
  • Token binding bypass — RFC 7800 cnf (Proof-of-Possession) can be
    silently ignored
  • See CVE-2025-59420 for full impact analysis

Suggested Fix

In jwt/api_jwt.py, add validation in _validate_headers() or
decode():

_SUPPORTED_CRIT = {"b64"}  # Add extensions PyJWT actually supports

def _validate_crit(self, headers: dict) -> None:
    crit = headers.get("crit")
    if crit is None:
        return
    if not isinstance(crit, list) or len(crit) == 0:
        raise InvalidTokenError("crit must be a non-empty array")
    for ext in crit:
        if ext not in self._SUPPORTED_CRIT:
            raise InvalidTokenError(f"Unsupported critical extension: {ext}")
        if ext not in headers:
            raise InvalidTokenError(f"Critical extension {ext} not in header")

CWE

  • CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
  • CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization

References

PyJWT accepts unknown crit header extensions

CVE-2026-32597 / GHSA-752w-5fwx-jx9f

More information

Details

Summary

PyJWT does not validate the crit (Critical) Header Parameter defined in
RFC 7515 §4.1.11. When a JWS token contains a crit array listing
extensions that PyJWT does not understand, the library accepts the token
instead of rejecting it. This violates the MUST requirement in the RFC.

This is the same class of vulnerability as CVE-2025-59420 (Authlib),
which received CVSS 7.5 (HIGH).

RFC Requirement

RFC 7515 §4.1.11:

The "crit" (Critical) Header Parameter indicates that extensions to this
specification and/or [JWA] are being used that MUST be understood and
processed. [...] If any of the listed extension Header Parameters are
not understood and supported by the recipient, then the JWS is invalid.

Proof of Concept
import jwt  # PyJWT 2.8.0
import hmac, hashlib, base64, json

##### Construct token with unknown critical extension
header = {"alg": "HS256", "crit": ["x-custom-policy"], "x-custom-policy": "require-mfa"}
payload = {"sub": "attacker", "role": "admin"}

def b64url(data):
    return base64.urlsafe_b64encode(data).rstrip(b"=").decode()

h = b64url(json.dumps(header, separators=(",", ":")).encode())
p = b64url(json.dumps(payload, separators=(",", ":")).encode())
sig = b64url(hmac.new(b"secret", f"{h}.{p}".encode(), hashlib.sha256).digest())
token = f"{h}.{p}.{sig}"

##### Should REJECT — x-custom-policy is not understood by PyJWT
try:
    result = jwt.decode(token, "secret", algorithms=["HS256"])
    print(f"ACCEPTED: {result}")
    # Output: ACCEPTED: {'sub': 'attacker', 'role': 'admin'}
except Exception as e:
    print(f"REJECTED: {e}")

Expected: jwt.exceptions.InvalidTokenError: Unsupported critical extension: x-custom-policy
Actual: Token accepted, payload returned.

Comparison with RFC-compliant library
##### jwcrypto — correctly rejects
from jwcrypto import jwt as jw_jwt, jwk
key = jwk.JWK(kty="oct", k=b64url(b"secret"))
jw_jwt.JWT(jwt=token, key=key, algs=["HS256"])

##### raises: InvalidJWSObject('Unknown critical header: "x-custom-policy"')
Impact
  • Split-brain verification in mixed-library deployments (e.g., API
    gateway using jwcrypto rejects, backend using PyJWT accepts)
  • Security policy bypass when crit carries enforcement semantics
    (MFA, token binding, scope restrictions)
  • Token binding bypass — RFC 7800 cnf (Proof-of-Possession) can be
    silently ignored
  • See CVE-2025-59420 for full impact analysis
Suggested Fix

In jwt/api_jwt.py, add validation in _validate_headers() or
decode():

_SUPPORTED_CRIT = {"b64"}  # Add extensions PyJWT actually supports

def _validate_crit(self, headers: dict) -> None:
    crit = headers.get("crit")
    if crit is None:
        return
    if not isinstance(crit, list) or len(crit) == 0:
        raise InvalidTokenError("crit must be a non-empty array")
    for ext in crit:
        if ext not in self._SUPPORTED_CRIT:
            raise InvalidTokenError(f"Unsupported critical extension: {ext}")
        if ext not in headers:
            raise InvalidTokenError(f"Critical extension {ext} not in header")
CWE
  • CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
  • CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization
References

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 7.5 / 10 (High)
  • Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

References

This data is provided by OSV and the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

Release Notes

jpadilla/pyjwt (pyjwt)

v2.12.0

Compare Source

Security
What's Changed
New Contributors

Full Changelog: jpadilla/pyjwt@2.11.0...2.12.0

v2.11.0

Compare Source

What's Changed
New Contributors

Full Changelog: jpadilla/pyjwt@2.10.1...2.11.0

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.

  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@platform-automation-dnastack
Copy link
Copy Markdown

platform-automation-dnastack commented Mar 14, 2026

Task linked: CU-86b4umhm1 Setup Renovate server and introduce it to wallet

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented Mar 14, 2026 •
edited
Loading

☂️ Python Coverage

current status: ✅

Overall Coverage

Lines Covered Coverage Threshold Status
11106 6576 59% 30% 🟢

New Files

No new covered files...

Modified Files

No covered modified files...

updated for commit: 6b60456 by action🐍

@dnastack-renovate dnastack-renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/pypi-pyjwt-vulnerability branch 3 times, most recently from 627672f to 67ae886 Compare March 25, 2026 18:21
@dnastack-renovate dnastack-renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/pypi-pyjwt-vulnerability branch from 67ae886 to 39ef5ba Compare March 25, 2026 21:37
@dnastack-renovate dnastack-renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/pypi-pyjwt-vulnerability branch from 39ef5ba to 6b60456 Compare April 1, 2026 19:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

renovate-security

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@platform-automation-dnastack