chore: 불필요해진 /content/ gitignore 규칙 제거

[CaesiumY]

Description

PR #101에서 추가한 /content/ 무시 규칙은 이제 불필요합니다. 단수 content/ Obsidian 볼트를 contents/로 통합·삭제(2026-07-01)했기 때문에, /content/는 존재하지 않는 폴더를 가리키는 죽은 규칙이 되었습니다.

제거하면 오히려 안전합니다: 만약 볼트 도구가 실수로 content/를 재생성하면, 무시 규칙이 없어야 git status에 노출되어 오설정을 즉시 알아챌 수 있습니다.

유지되는 것

• .obsidian/, .claudian/ 규칙은 그대로 유지 — 이전한 contents/.obsidian·contents/.claudian(볼트 설정/세션)를 계속 무시해야 함. 검증: git check-ignore contents/.obsidian/app.json = 매칭됨.

Types of changes

• Others (repo 위생: .gitignore 정리)

Checklist

• Breaking Change

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request updates the .gitignore file by removing the /content/ directory exclusion and updating the comments related to the Obsidian vault and Claudian settings. There are no review comments, and I have no additional feedback to provide.

Important

The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub is being sunset. Starting June 18, 2026, new organization installations will be blocked, and all code review activity will officially cease on July 17, 2026.
For more details on the timeline and next steps, please review the Help Documentation.

[claude]

Review

Verified the claims in the PR description directly:

• content/ (singular) does not exist anywhere in the repo — confirmed with ls content/ → "No such file or directory". The removed rule was indeed dead.
• No other file in the repo (docs, CI config, scripts) references the singular /content/ path, so nothing else needs updating alongside this change.
• The retained .obsidian/ and .claudian/ patterns have no leading slash, so per gitignore semantics they still match at any depth, including contents/.obsidian/ and contents/.claudian/ — the PR's claim that these keep working is correct.
• git log -- .gitignore confirms the rule being removed here was added in chore: gitignore Obsidian/Claudian 볼트 루트(content/) 추가 #101, consistent with the stated timeline (added, then made obsolete by the content/ → contents/ vault consolidation on 2026-07-01).

Code quality / correctness: change is minimal, correct, and well-scoped — just a comment tweak and rule removal, no behavior change to the blog build. No bugs, no performance impact, no security concerns (this is a .gitignore-only change).

Test coverage: not applicable — a .gitignore edit has no runtime surface to test, and none of the referenced e2e/build gates depend on this file's contents beyond what's still in place.

One minor nit (non-blocking): the PR checklist under "Types of changes" has [ ] Breaking Change unchecked, which is correct and consistent with this being a safe, non-breaking cleanup — no action needed.

Overall: LGTM. This is a clean, low-risk repo-hygiene fix that removes a stale rule while correctly preserving the ones still needed.