Skip to content

Conversation

@jmwright
Copy link
Member

@jmwright jmwright commented Dec 16, 2025

No description provided.

@shimwell
Copy link
Collaborator

Would it also work if we have a new physical group for each material. Instead of making physical groups a combination of the name and material with the ~ divider. If we have separate physical groups, one for each name and one for each material would that work? I guess it makes it hard to identify which groups are names and which are materials later on so perhaps we can prefix the material physical groups with mat: this is the same prefix we use in DAGMC so perhaps it is a standard hack :-)

@jmwright
Copy link
Member Author

@shimwell I've made that change to attach the material name via a physical group.

@jmwright jmwright marked this pull request as ready for review December 22, 2025 12:57
@jmwright jmwright requested a review from shimwell December 22, 2025 12:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants