feat: add root dev and build scripts for monorepo

[ArchitectVS7]

Add root dev and build scripts to run frontend Vite server.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
v0-task-man	Error		Feb 17, 2026 2:34pm

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @ArchitectVS7, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request enhances the monorepo's development experience by providing convenient top-level scripts for managing the frontend application. It allows developers to initiate the frontend development server and build process directly from the project root, abstracting away the need to navigate into sub-directories. Additionally, the inclusion of a pnpm lockfile guarantees that all team members and CI/CD pipelines use the exact same dependency versions, preventing potential 'works on my machine' issues.

Highlights

• Root Development Scripts: Added dev and build scripts to the root package.json to simplify starting the frontend development server and building the frontend application.
• Dependency Locking: Introduced a pnpm-lock.yaml file to ensure consistent dependency installations across all environments.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Changelog

• package.json
  • Added a new dev script that executes npm run dev --prefix frontend.
  • Added a new build script that executes npm run build --prefix frontend.
  • Ensured the file ends with a newline character.
• pnpm-lock.yaml
  • Created a new pnpm lockfile, which records the exact versions of all installed dependencies and their sub-dependencies.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request adds root dev and build scripts to the monorepo's package.json to facilitate running the frontend application. The changes are straightforward, but there's an inconsistency in the package manager used. While a pnpm-lock.yaml file is being introduced, suggesting pnpm is the standard, the new scripts use npm. My feedback suggests aligning the scripts to use pnpm for consistency.

[ArchitectVS7]

@gemini resolved failing backend CI test

[gemini-code-assist]

Thanks for the update, @ArchitectVS7! That's great to hear. I'll proceed with the full review now.

[ArchitectVS7]

@gemini please excuse the type, I meant please "resolve" the failing test

[gemini-code-assist]

Thanks for the clarification, @ArchitectVS7. I understand you meant to ask me to "resolve" the failing test. However, as an AI, I am unable to take direct actions like resolving tests or making changes to the codebase. My role is to provide feedback and suggestions on the pull request.

I will proceed with the full review based on the current state of the pull request, taking into account any changes you've made to address the failing CI test.