Skip to content

Conversation

@Sophie-Ag00001
Copy link
Collaborator

PR Description: WalletDb Initialization in StorageNode

Summary of Changes

This pull request introduces a new WalletDb initialization in the StorageNode::new() function located in src/storage.rs. The implementation mirrors the WalletDb initialization found in src/miner.rs to ensure consistent behavior across modules.

Motivation

The addition of WalletDb initialization to StorageNode is aimed at enhancing the functionality of wallet management within the storage component of the application. This change is intended to provide seamless integration and improve overall performance-related tasks that depend on wallet operations.

Background

Previously, the StorageNode did not include WalletDb initialization, which could lead to discrepancies in how wallet data was handled between storage and mining contexts. This update synchronizes the initialization process to support better wallet operations and data integrity.

Testing Instructions

To test the changes:

  1. Compile the project using cargo build.
  2. Run existing unit tests to ensure no regressions have occurred with cargo test.
  3. Verify that the WalletDb can be initialized correctly in StorageNode without impacting existing functionality.

Known Issues / Limitations

  • There are no known issues or limitations at this time. However, further testing in real-world scenarios may be necessary to ensure compatibility and performance benchmarks are met.

Thank you for reviewing this pull request! Your feedback is appreciated.

…Node::new() function in src/storage.rs, similar to the WalletDb initialization in src/miner.rs. ONLY WORK ON src/storage.rs, NO OTHER FILES. DO NOT DELETE ANY CODE OR FILES.
@Sophie-Ag00001 Sophie-Ag00001 requested a review from a team as a code owner January 15, 2025 05:28
@BHouwens BHouwens closed this Jan 15, 2025
@BHouwens BHouwens deleted the feature/add-walletdb-initialization-function branch January 15, 2025 05:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants