Add WalletDb Initialization to MempoolNode::new() in src/mempool.rs #102
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR Description: Add WalletDb Initialization to MempoolNode
Summary of Changes
This pull request implements WalletDb initialization within the
MempoolNode::new()function insrc/mempool.rs. The initialization pattern follows the same structure as implemented insrc/miner.rs, ensuring consistency across components while setting up the database for the Mempool Node.Motivation
The motivation behind this change is to establish a uniform approach to database initialization across different modules of our application. By incorporating WalletDb initialization in the MempoolNode, we enhance its functionality and facilitate better state management for transactions in the memory pool.
Context
WalletDb is essential for managing wallet-related data, and its proper integration within the Mempool Node ensures that the node can efficiently handle transaction information. This change is aligned with previous enhancements made in the miner module, contributing to a more cohesive codebase.
Testing Instructions
src/mempool.rsfile and verify that the changes to theMempoolNode::new()function are present.cargo testKnown Issues or Limitations
Feel free to review and provide feedback on the proposed changes!