Skip to content

Conversation

@Sophie-Ag00001
Copy link
Collaborator

PR Description: Add WalletDb Initialization to MempoolNode

Summary of Changes

This pull request implements WalletDb initialization within the MempoolNode::new() function in src/mempool.rs. The initialization pattern follows the same structure as implemented in src/miner.rs, ensuring consistency across components while setting up the database for the Mempool Node.

Motivation

The motivation behind this change is to establish a uniform approach to database initialization across different modules of our application. By incorporating WalletDb initialization in the MempoolNode, we enhance its functionality and facilitate better state management for transactions in the memory pool.

Context

WalletDb is essential for managing wallet-related data, and its proper integration within the Mempool Node ensures that the node can efficiently handle transaction information. This change is aligned with previous enhancements made in the miner module, contributing to a more cohesive codebase.

Testing Instructions

  1. Clone the branch associated with this pull request.
  2. Navigate to the src/mempool.rs file and verify that the changes to the MempoolNode::new() function are present.
  3. Run the application's test suite to validate that there are no regressions and that the Mempool Node functions correctly with the new WalletDb initialization:
    cargo test

Known Issues or Limitations

  • There are no known issues resulting from these changes, but thorough testing is recommended to confirm seamless integration with existing functionality.

Feel free to review and provide feedback on the proposed changes!

…) function in src/mempool.rs, similar to the WalletDb initialization in src/miner.rs. ONLY WORK ON src/mempool.rs, NO OTHER FILES
@Sophie-Ag00001 Sophie-Ag00001 requested a review from a team as a code owner January 14, 2025 05:56
@BHouwens BHouwens closed this Jan 15, 2025
@BHouwens BHouwens deleted the feature/add-walletdb-initialization-mempoolnodenew branch January 15, 2025 05:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants