-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 67
Correct invalid names in journal files #2086
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
c-p-schmidt
wants to merge
4
commits into
4C-multiphysics:main
Choose a base branch
from
c-p-schmidt:1973-correct-invalid-names
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If I understand this correctly, this now always throws an error if there is a condition definition in the input with a name longer than 32 characters. Isn't this overly restrictive? Gmsh and vtu meshes have no problem with reading meshes with long node set names. Maybe we shouldn't check that here, but in the Exodus reader itself, when a nodeset was read that has exactly 32 characters? Or, we only display a note about this problem when a nodeset has not been found by name, and it has more than 32 characters.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I also thought about that, but the problem is that I do not have the relevant information in the Exodus reader. One could only use the name length provided by the Exodus method as a proxy. If it has fewer than 32 characters, it was ok; if it has 32 characters, it might have been exactly the right length or too long. Which also felt like an unsatisfying solution to me.
However, you are right that this may be too strict for other mesh readers (I do not know). I just thought that 32 characters might be long enough anyway. But if you have doubts, we could only output a warning stating that for the Exodus reader, 32 characters is the maximum, and then the code would terminate later anyway, as the condition is not found in the mesh.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would be in favor of that. This would only look a little strange if someone defines a name in exodus with exactly 32 characters and already knows about the limitation. In almost all scenarios, the user would see a warning about the length first and a crash immediately afterwards.