feat: new observe_coeval function#74
Conversation
|
So this is just to save time from having to compute every sigma at every slice? But it could be the same as if we provide a coeval, and an array filled with the same redshifts for the |
|
@nikos-triantafyllou yes, it should be essentially the same as running So, in the end it is faster and more convenient. |
nikos-triantafyllou
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good, I am still a bit concerned if it complicates things, but we can remove it later based on the final workflow we decide on.
Add a function to easily "observe" a coeval box. This has many similarities to
observe_lightcone(and perhaps we could merge some of the code) but also some simplifications (especially due to having only one redshift).I opted to go the "simpler" route of only having to supply the
Observationand the coeval dimensions, rather than the full sigma_uv like we do forobserve_lightcone. I could be argued out of this, or argued into applying the same to theobserve_lightconefunction.