Some extensions inject widgets and other hidden DOM content that is at risk of being inadvertently removed by the host website. Some examples:
- overlays (modals, tooltips, notifications, anything that doesn't change the layout)
- iframes (used for sandboxing or by APIs clients (e.h. gapi))
<style> created by the content script
I think we'd benefit from a way to inject content without risking (style) conflicts, removal by the host, race conditions, etc.
Proposal
Offer a shadow/child/detached/isolated document context that extensions can interact with without being detected. This document would be visually overlaid on the page, if any elements are visible, without causing any layout shifts.
const modal = document.createElement('dialog');
modal.append(document.createElement('iframe'))
browser.dom.attach(modal, {style: 'isolated'});
modal.showModal();
const style = document.createElement('style');
ReactDom.render(<CssVariablesUpdatedViaIframeWidgetOrSomething/>, style);
browser.dom.attach(style);
I haven't put much thought into the actual API that would enable this, as it would probably have to follow the browser limits/implementation.
Prior art
- content script styles appear as "injected stylesheet" in Chrome but are not actually attached to the
document. They might now be surfaced in this document.
- content scripts have a dedicated execution world, which the host cannot access
Other more specific requests
Some extensions inject widgets and other hidden DOM content that is at risk of being inadvertently removed by the host website. Some examples:
<style>created by the content scriptI think we'd benefit from a way to inject content without risking (style) conflicts, removal by the host, race conditions, etc.
Proposal
Offer a shadow/child/detached/isolated document context that extensions can interact with without being detected. This document would be visually overlaid on the page, if any elements are visible, without causing any layout shifts.
I haven't put much thought into the actual API that would enable this, as it would probably have to follow the browser limits/implementation.
Prior art
document. They might now be surfaced in this document.Other more specific requests