It seems to me that the description of the route-object-include-exclude list is
complex. Are you sure you are not overloading the meaning? That is, the
interpretation of an empty list might be less convoluted if it was conveyed by
distinct objects.
There is also some confusion in my mind about the details.
<...>
B. I don't understand the following...
2. An empty 'route-object-include-exclude' list for the
primary path of a TE Tunnel Segment indicates that no
primary LSP is required for that TE Tunnel.
What does it mean to have no primary path? Also, should an additional
"Segment" be added to the end of the paragraph?
Further, the previous point says:
1. An empty 'route-object-include-exclude' list for the
primary path of an end-to-end TE Tunnel indicates that
there are no route objects to be included or excluded in
the path computation.
...and it seems to me that a segment could be the entire e2e tunnel.
