-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Description
-
CSV table entries documentation
PK: Table with abbreviations of Boney field names / measures (e.g., opts_bmethod, ...). -
Correlation figure:
PK: The correlation figures from validation are too confusing. We should limit the amount. The first row of scatterplots for BMD would be enough, and the second row of scatterplots for the fat.
RD: Agree, two versions are needed, one detailed for us or the supplement and one official simple one. The official once should also not use any colour coding that is only to get a fast overview of each measure. I can make a new correlation table/plot in R with a package that will automatically correct for multiple comparisons
For the overview figure, we should remove all none-bone and non-fat parameter that we not further evaluate as simple application case such as the sitting height.
Btw. do we have some heart fitness parameter (that may correlate with fat).
PK: Yes, but I would not include them. -
Correlation figure:
PK: Happiness and health satisfaction can be deleted from the correlation plot.
RD: Ok. Will update this later.
PK: I guess you don’t have to, if we are to calculate everything new anyway. -
Multiple figures:
PK: What is rCMV? Some abbreviations are not self-explanatory. Should provide the caption with the abbreviations.
RD: relative CSF (matter) volume. I will correct this later.
PK: I would not use the word “matter” in this case -
Boney report:
RD: Abbreviations in the boney report are unclear! -
Refined processing setup:
PK: The refined processing is only available for the expert mode? Isn’t this not that optimal?
RD: This is only for the GUI and it is active otherwise, i.e., a default user cannot switch the refined/optimal/corrected processing off.
PK: Yes, but wouldn’t we want the people to get refined segments and not the direct SPM segments?
RD: They are getting by default. This only allows expert to turn it off.