Descriptive summary
We have a use case for dataset deposits that require a 2-step review workflow, first by OSU folks outside of the library and then by one of our library data curators, similar to the GTD workflow. It seems the way to handle this is with a new work type.
For our pilot project with CEOAS, the datasets will be hosted in CEOAS' Globus instance with a metadata record and external resource link in SA; after deposit, the dataset is reviewed by CEOAS staff; after approval it is reviewed and approved by Clara; Clara registers a DOI for the dataset with Datacite.
Expected behavior
The new work type would be a copy of the existing Dataset work type except with a different review workflow.
Stretch goals / anticipated add-ons
-
Optimistically we'd like to expand partnerships beyond CEOAS, meaning we would want flexibility in routing to different OSU partner reviewers. This could be a dropdown selection that the depositor makes, for example. However, at the outset a single routing option to CEOAS (specifically Thomas Olson) is sufficient (and the extended capability would be a separate ticket).
-
Eventually we'd like to incorporate a checklist for depositors that CEOAS is working on into the submission process, but they haven't shared it and how this would work is not yet well described. We'll get a better idea during the summer 2025 pilot and will ticket it separately.
Accessibility Concerns
none
Descriptive summary
We have a use case for dataset deposits that require a 2-step review workflow, first by OSU folks outside of the library and then by one of our library data curators, similar to the GTD workflow. It seems the way to handle this is with a new work type.
For our pilot project with CEOAS, the datasets will be hosted in CEOAS' Globus instance with a metadata record and external resource link in SA; after deposit, the dataset is reviewed by CEOAS staff; after approval it is reviewed and approved by Clara; Clara registers a DOI for the dataset with Datacite.
Expected behavior
The new work type would be a copy of the existing Dataset work type except with a different review workflow.
Stretch goals / anticipated add-ons
Optimistically we'd like to expand partnerships beyond CEOAS, meaning we would want flexibility in routing to different OSU partner reviewers. This could be a dropdown selection that the depositor makes, for example. However, at the outset a single routing option to CEOAS (specifically Thomas Olson) is sufficient (and the extended capability would be a separate ticket).
Eventually we'd like to incorporate a checklist for depositors that CEOAS is working on into the submission process, but they haven't shared it and how this would work is not yet well described. We'll get a better idea during the summer 2025 pilot and will ticket it separately.
Accessibility Concerns
none