Skip to content

Description in Rayleigh-Sommerfeld (RS) seems not consistent #3

@MagicKidPGC

Description

@MagicKidPGC
Image In the above section, the definition of the RS integral seems to be an approximation that ignores 1/R terms compared to the ik term. It seems to me that the code implementation is correct and it follows the definition of the kernal. So I suggest maybe it is better to keep it to exact all the time, including the first time defining the RS integral.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions