📌 Issue: Improve Developer Workflow with a Smarter Project/App Generator
🎯 Overview
Currently, the new <appName> command sets up a boilerplate, but everything is bundled under one workflow. It would be more efficient to separate make app from make project, allowing each to follow its own path for generation and structure.
💡 Proposed Improvement
Introduce a smarter, plan-driven generation system that distinguishes between:
These could be powered by a plan file (like a pseudo-definition or YAML/JSON spec) that defines the structure of the desired output, allowing entire applications to be generated from a high-level blueprint.
✅ Benefits
- Speed Boost: Massively reduces time spent setting up boilerplate and repetitive tasks.
- Consistency: Enforces a predictable and clean architecture across projects.
- Productivity: Lets developers focus on building features, not scaffolding.
- Creativity: Frees mental overhead, giving more space to innovate.
- Deadline Friendly: Helps meet tight timelines with minimal overhead.
📌 Issue: Improve Developer Workflow with a Smarter Project/App Generator
🎯 Overview
Currently, the
new <appName>command sets up a boilerplate, but everything is bundled under one workflow. It would be more efficient to separatemake appfrommake project, allowing each to follow its own path for generation and structure.💡 Proposed Improvement
Introduce a smarter, plan-driven generation system that distinguishes between:
make project– sets up the full project structure.make app– adds modular apps or features within the project.Other generators like:
make-schemamake-crudmake-routeThese could be powered by a plan file (like a pseudo-definition or YAML/JSON spec) that defines the structure of the desired output, allowing entire applications to be generated from a high-level blueprint.
✅ Benefits