I face some trouble with mooring 4, 5 and 6:
- by default,
openseafracT is used to find the coordinate of the closest point. 4, 5 and 6 are under FRIS, so I suggest to use seafracT for the mooring instead of openseafracT
- then, in def_grids.py, depth for these moorings is not defined:
elif ( region == 'Weddell' ) & ( mooring == 3 ): # AWI_254
longitude=np.array([ -31.48375 ])
latitude=np.array([ -75.9624 ])
#depth=np.array([ 553.0 ])
depth=np.arange(0.,1160.,10.)
elif ( region == 'Weddell' ) & ( mooring == 4 ): # site 5
longitude=np.array([ -54.71 ])
latitude=np.array([ -80.29 ])
depth=np.array([ ])
elif ( region == 'Weddell' ) & ( mooring == 5 ): # FSW
longitude=np.array([ -44.43 ])
latitude=np.array([ -80.44 ])
depth=np.array([ ])
elif ( region == 'Weddell' ) & ( mooring == 6 ): # FSE
longitude=np.array([ -40.83 ])
latitude=np.array([ -81.08 ])
depth=np.array([ ])
Should we need to use the same depth as for the others ? Based on table 3 of the protocol yes.
- In the protocal table 3, there is also 2 extra moorings (7 and 8), but they are not listed in
generate_mooring_grid_oce. Is it a bug, or finally these mooring are not needed anymore for MISOMIP2 ?
I face some trouble with mooring 4, 5 and 6:
openseafracTis used to find the coordinate of the closest point. 4, 5 and 6 are under FRIS, so I suggest to use seafracT for the mooring instead of openseafracTShould we need to use the same depth as for the others ? Based on table 3 of the protocol yes.
generate_mooring_grid_oce. Is it a bug, or finally these mooring are not needed anymore for MISOMIP2 ?