Skip to content

enhancement: unify hydrophobic patch output format #53

@biubiuubiuu

Description

@biubiuubiuu

Thank you very much for your code!
I noticed that the output formats of pep_patch_hydrophobic and pep_patch_electrostatic are not entirely consistent.
Could you please consider adding the corresponding patch information to the output of pep_patch_hydrophobic, similar to what is provided in pep_patch_electrostatic?

Specifically, it would be helpful to include:
type, area, value, main_residue, and residues,
where the value can be derived from the SAP calculation that is already supported.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions