We should standardize how we address packaging this version-wise, and then go out to all packages using Koa@next and let them know of the standards. This is super confusing to end-users. It seems like Koa@next is unstable by not being the latest. Is Koa@1.x even really used as much as Koa@2.x? It's just super confusing to package maintainers to have to make a version that's not the latest but SHOULD be used (since it's newer/better - we should just add deprecation notices to people if they install a new version that is using koa@next? maybe we standardize the deprecation notice?).
We should standardize how we address packaging this version-wise, and then go out to all packages using Koa@next and let them know of the standards. This is super confusing to end-users. It seems like Koa@next is unstable by not being the latest. Is Koa@1.x even really used as much as Koa@2.x? It's just super confusing to package maintainers to have to make a version that's not the latest but SHOULD be used (since it's newer/better - we should just add deprecation notices to people if they install a new version that is using koa@next? maybe we standardize the deprecation notice?).