diff --git a/docs/technical/security-scope-lifecycle.md b/docs/technical/security-scope-lifecycle.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f5c374a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/technical/security-scope-lifecycle.md
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+# Technical Documentation: Security-Scoped Bookmark Lifecycle
+
+This document details how Clawsy persists access to user-selected folders across app launches using macOS's security-scoped bookmarks. Understanding this lifecycle is critical for any developer working on features related to the shared folder.
+
+## What are Security-Scoped Bookmarks?
+
+Due to the macOS App Sandbox, an app cannot persistently access arbitrary file system locations. If a user selects a folder, the app loses access to it as soon as it's restarted.
+
+To solve this, macOS provides "security-scoped bookmarks". These are small pieces of `Data` that securely encapsulate the permission to access a specific file or folder. By storing this bookmark data, the app can resolve it back into a usable URL and re-gain access after a restart.
+
+## The Lifecycle in Clawsy
+
+The entire logic is managed within `Sources/ClawsyShared/SharedConfig.swift`.
+
+### 1. Storage
+
+- When a user selects a shared folder in the UI, the app creates a security-scoped bookmark from the folder's URL.
+- This bookmark (`Data`) is stored in `UserDefaults` under the key `sharedFolderBookmark`.
+
+### 2. Resolving the Bookmark and Starting Access
+
+Access is initiated via the static function `SharedConfig.resolveBookmark() -> URL?`. This function is the single source of truth for getting a usable URL for the shared folder.
+
+Here's what it does on its **first call** during an app session:
+
+1.  It retrieves the raw bookmark `Data` from `UserDefaults`.
+2.  It calls `URL(resolvingBookmarkData:options:...)` with the `.withSecurityScope` option. This converts the data back into a URL but does not yet grant access.
+3.  **Crucially, it calls `url.startAccessingSecurityScopedResource()`**. This is the call that asks the OS to enable Clawsy's permission to use the URL for this session.
+4.  If access is granted, the function caches the resolved `URL` in a static variable `SharedConfig.resolvedFolderUrl`.
+5.  The function then returns the URL.
+
+On **subsequent calls** during the same app session, the function simply returns the cached URL from `SharedConfig.resolvedFolderUrl`, avoiding the overhead of re-resolving and re-starting access.
+
+### 3. Ending Access
+
+The `startAccessingSecurityScopedResource()` call must be balanced by a corresponding `stopAccessingSecurityScopedResource()` call to release the resource.
+
+**This is the most critical part of the lifecycle:**
+
+- The `stop` call is **not** automatically managed or paired with the `start` call (e.g., in a `defer` block).
+- Access is explicitly stopped in other parts of the application when the resource is no longer needed.
+- For example, `SettingsView.swift` calls `SharedConfig.resolvedFolderUrl?.stopAccessingSecurityScopedResource()` when the view disappears or a new folder is chosen.
+
+### Risks and Developer Best Practices
+
+The separation of `start` and `stop` creates a potential for resource leaks or premature access revocation.
+
+- **Rule:** Any part of the code that uses the URL obtained from `resolveBookmark()` should be aware of this lifecycle.
+- **Guideline:** If a piece of code is the "owner" of a specific, bounded access period, it is responsible for calling `stopAccessingSecurityScopedResource()` when it is finished.
+- **Example:** A background file-watcher that uses the URL should not call `stop` until it is shut down, as this would prevent other parts of the app from using the URL. Conversely, a one-shot function that just lists the files should ideally `stop` access when it's done, but only if it can be sure no other part of the app is currently relying on that access.
+
+Due to the static caching, the current implementation implies a **session-long access period** that is started on first use and (inconsistently) stopped when certain UI elements are dismissed. Developers should be extremely cautious when modifying this logic.