Feature Request: Export .df_regression_stat_labels

[kieranjmartin]

What's the feature?

Just as in cards, I think it makes sense to let the user know about the default stat labels which are available

[ddsjoberg]

Can you help me understand the context here? This is just a little internal function to help assign a default stat labels; how would a user use this function it if were exported? Labels can always be changed with cards::update_ard_stat_label().

[kieranjmartin]

So my logic here is that I am looking to try to ensure that stat_name is created consistently. Particularly thinking of the context of double programming, I think it makes sense to try to keep these names the same where possible. I noticed that cards does surface this to users but this isn't the case in cardx. I don't know if this is currently a priority; I can see that the survey default labels are slightly different to other labels, but I feel like this would make sense

[ddsjoberg]

Ah, I see. When those first ARD functions were written in cards, the cards::update_ard_stat_label() hadn't yet been written. FYI

In some cardx functions the default labels change depending on the context, e.g. if you're calling the t-test ARD function the labels are different for one sample, two sample, and paired tests.

I am not sure I love the idea of having a every cardx function include a stat_label argument which would then include a default function that is specific for that cardx function, and where that function may need to be a bit complex in some cases.

For now, I would lea towards suggesting the use cards::update_ard_stat_label() which can be consistently applied across all functions.