Link da PR
https://github.com/infinitybase/renave-api/pull/454
Tipo do problema
false-positive
Projeto
RENAVE
Repositorio
infinitybase/renave-api
Codigo flaggado
const hasEnrichmentOrCacheInAttendance = await manager
.getRepository(ExternalCost)
.count({
where: {
process: { clientRequestId },
type: In([
ExternalCostTypes.ENRICHMENT_PLATE,
ExternalCostTypes.CHECK_TUDO_ENRICHMENT,
ExternalCostTypes.ENRICHMENT_CACHE,
]),
},
});
Comentario da IA
🔴 CRITICAL: Query scope changed from process.id to clientRequestId
Problem: The query was changed from filtering by process: { id: process.id } to process: { clientRequestId }. This fundamentally changes what records are being counted - from costs for a specific process instance to costs for any process with the same clientRequestId. This could cause incorrect cost recording behavior if multiple processes share the same clientRequestId.
Suggestion: Clarify if this change is intentional. If clientRequestId can be shared across processes, document this behavior. If not, revert to using process.id or add both conditions to ensure proper scoping.
Severidade do comentario da IA
CRITICAL
Por que esta errado
Mudança intencional alinhada às regras de negócio do produto, onde um Atendimento pode ter vários processos.
Regra de negocio (se aplicavel)
No response
Link da PR
https://github.com/infinitybase/renave-api/pull/454
Tipo do problema
false-positive
Projeto
RENAVE
Repositorio
infinitybase/renave-api
Codigo flaggado
Comentario da IA
🔴 CRITICAL: Query scope changed from process.id to clientRequestId
Problem: The query was changed from filtering by process: { id: process.id } to process: { clientRequestId }. This fundamentally changes what records are being counted - from costs for a specific process instance to costs for any process with the same clientRequestId. This could cause incorrect cost recording behavior if multiple processes share the same clientRequestId.
Suggestion: Clarify if this change is intentional. If clientRequestId can be shared across processes, document this behavior. If not, revert to using process.id or add both conditions to ensure proper scoping.
Severidade do comentario da IA
CRITICAL
Por que esta errado
Mudança intencional alinhada às regras de negócio do produto, onde um Atendimento pode ter vários processos.
Regra de negocio (se aplicavel)
No response