Skip to content

"cluster" is a misleading term, use "tag", "category", "group" or something instead #115

@reiy-leo

Description

@reiy-leo

The term cluster is typically used in centralized network architectures, whereas malai operates in a decentralized environment. This makes the use of cluster feel confusing and potentially misleading.

For example, if I have 100 computers, and any one of them wants to access the other 99, it must manually include all 99 ID52 identities in its local cluster.toml file. It’s not like joining a cluster automatically grants access to other members. So what’s the actual purpose of the cluster?

Moreover, if any two of those 100 computers—say, computer A is part of a cluster named wjdr, and computer B is not part of any cluster—B can still connect to A as long as it knows A’s ID52. That makes the concept of a cluster and cluster manager seem irrelevant.

Perhaps terms like tag, group or category would be more appropriate, since they are inherently non-centralized and better reflect the architecture of malai.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions