I realize that this is not really a big issue, but by factoring out the repetitive SQL insert statements in the Weather stationsList.js files, this file size could be cut down by approximately 50% i believe. For example:
var stationsList = ["insert into StationList (latitude, longitude, xml_url) values (-22.017, 166.217, 'NWWW');",
"insert into StationList (latitude, longitude, xml_url) values (-21.233, -175.15, 'NFTF');",
........
];
By removing the continuously repeated string in the statement, you can then place it once in the following block:
for (var i=0; i<arrLength; i++) {
tx.executeSql('insert into StationList (latitude, longitude, xml_url) values ('+stationsList[i]+');', null, incrementPercent);
}
The result would be a much smaller file size. As I previously mentioned, this may not be of much importance but it does cut down file size which in my opinion is always a good thing!
I realize that this is not really a big issue, but by factoring out the repetitive SQL insert statements in the Weather stationsList.js files, this file size could be cut down by approximately 50% i believe. For example:
var stationsList = ["insert into StationList (latitude, longitude, xml_url) values (-22.017, 166.217, 'NWWW');",
"insert into StationList (latitude, longitude, xml_url) values (-21.233, -175.15, 'NFTF');",
........
];
By removing the continuously repeated string in the statement, you can then place it once in the following block:
for (var i=0; i<arrLength; i++) {
tx.executeSql('insert into StationList (latitude, longitude, xml_url) values ('+stationsList[i]+');', null, incrementPercent);
}
The result would be a much smaller file size. As I previously mentioned, this may not be of much importance but it does cut down file size which in my opinion is always a good thing!