From 2b98515e31766a1b29ec1fe61d1c28d655332d6f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: selpahi Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 22:26:08 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] general style question about any definitions Should the definitions include sumti types? Should they be phrased "x1 (li)..." or "x1 (number)", "x2 (ka)" or "x2 (property)", etc? Either way, it should be consistent. And what all those gismu that used to be used with {nu}, but are now more commonly used with {ka}? --- global/general style question about any definitions | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) create mode 100644 global/general style question about any definitions diff --git a/global/general style question about any definitions b/global/general style question about any definitions new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c0d8fa9 --- /dev/null +++ b/global/general style question about any definitions @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +Should the definitions include sumti types? Should they be phrased "x1 (li)" or "x1 (number)", "x2 (ka)" or "x2 (property)", etc? +Either way, it should be consistent. +And what all those gismu that used to be used with {nu}, but are now more commonly used with {ka}?