Hi @aysylu - opening this as a public note alongside an email I just sent you.
I'm Savy, a Clojure dev (4 years at PayPal, plus a side project reviving Clojure libraries I find useful). loom's the obvious one to care about - it's still the de-facto graph library - but it looks like it hasn't had a maintainer merge since 2021.
Rather than just pile onto the issue tracker, I've already done the work on a fork (https://github.com/jsavyasachi/loom):
It's all green, and I kept your copyright and the EPL intact.
I'm currently publishing under a longer coordinate (net.clojars.savya/loom), but the fixes really only help people if they land on the canonical loom name. A few ways that could happen, whatever you're most comfortable with:
- Add me as a maintainer here (or transfer the repo) + add me to the
loom Clojars group, or
- Route it through clj-commons and I maintain it under their umbrella, or
- I keep publishing under my own name with your blessing.
Genuinely open to other ideas too. No pressure either way - and thanks for loom, it's held up really well.
Savy
Hi @aysylu - opening this as a public note alongside an email I just sent you.
I'm Savy, a Clojure dev (4 years at PayPal, plus a side project reviving Clojure libraries I find useful). loom's the obvious one to care about - it's still the de-facto graph library - but it looks like it hasn't had a maintainer merge since 2021.
Rather than just pile onto the issue tracker, I've already done the work on a fork (https://github.com/jsavyasachi/loom):
It's all green, and I kept your copyright and the EPL intact.
I'm currently publishing under a longer coordinate (
net.clojars.savya/loom), but the fixes really only help people if they land on the canonicalloomname. A few ways that could happen, whatever you're most comfortable with:loomClojars group, orGenuinely open to other ideas too. No pressure either way - and thanks for loom, it's held up really well.
Savy