with the existing format the year for scheduling in nav-banners is not specified which seems to be simple and intuitive. currently we assume the current year, which is probably working but what would be expected in simulation, so it would be better to assume the year where the date is closest to the current date, so 1/1 would intuitively mean 1/1/2026.
with the existing format the year for scheduling in
nav-bannersis not specified which seems to be simple and intuitive. currently we assume the current year, which is probably working but what would be expected in simulation, so it would be better to assume the year where the date is closest to the current date, so 1/1 would intuitively mean 1/1/2026.