Hi
As pointed in the README for RDMA-based connections, I was referring to AlveoLink. Their default target for Hivenet and cmac packages (.xo files) is U55c card. I see in few of the examples of TAPA-CS, U250 is considered. For example: ( line9: --part-num xcu250-figd2104-2L-e) in file apps/multi-fpga-vadd/run_tapa.sh.
Should Hivenet and cmac .xo files be regenerated for U250? or can the same U55c .xo files be used for U250 as well? can you please clarify on this.
Thanks.
Hi
As pointed in the README for RDMA-based connections, I was referring to AlveoLink. Their default target for Hivenet and cmac packages (.xo files) is U55c card. I see in few of the examples of TAPA-CS, U250 is considered. For example: ( line9: --part-num xcu250-figd2104-2L-e) in file
apps/multi-fpga-vadd/run_tapa.sh.Should Hivenet and cmac .xo files be regenerated for U250? or can the same U55c .xo files be used for U250 as well? can you please clarify on this.
Thanks.