Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Hi, I know very little about ANT+. I was playing around with an exercise bike which was coming back as an UnknownDevice type. I (well AI) decoded it to data page 0x15 StationaryBike. It looks like this device was removed in the latest Fitness Equipment spec document (D000001231) and 0x15 marked as reserved. It is specified in the legacy Fitness Equipment document (D00001704, page 38).
Describe the solution you'd like
Given the whole ANT+ protocol appears to be deprecated, I wonder if despite 0x15 now being marked as reserved, whether an implementation for StationaryBike would be appropriate (since presumably there would not be any future update to the protocol which uses 0x15).
An AI-generated, human-reviewed implementation is at master...Rob-Hague:AntPlus:stationarybike. I've not tested it on the bike, but I should be able to next weekend.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Doing nothing, this is purely a hobby/curiosity exercise
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Hi, I know very little about ANT+. I was playing around with an exercise bike which was coming back as an
UnknownDevicetype. I (well AI) decoded it to data page 0x15 StationaryBike. It looks like this device was removed in the latest Fitness Equipment spec document (D000001231) and 0x15 marked as reserved. It is specified in the legacy Fitness Equipment document (D00001704, page 38).Describe the solution you'd like
Given the whole ANT+ protocol appears to be deprecated, I wonder if despite 0x15 now being marked as reserved, whether an implementation for StationaryBike would be appropriate (since presumably there would not be any future update to the protocol which uses 0x15).
An AI-generated, human-reviewed implementation is at master...Rob-Hague:AntPlus:stationarybike. I've not tested it on the bike, but I should be able to next weekend.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Doing nothing, this is purely a hobby/curiosity exercise