Basically, codefactor thinks all sapply() calls should be re-written as vapply(). I'm inclined to think it doesn't really matter much, but if anyone wants to go chase that codefactor A rating, this these are the things that need to be refactored.
CodeFactor found multiple issues:
Function "sapply" is undesirable. As an alternative, use vapply() with an appropriate FUN.VALUE= argument to obtain type-stable simplification.
Basically, codefactor thinks all sapply() calls should be re-written as vapply(). I'm inclined to think it doesn't really matter much, but if anyone wants to go chase that codefactor A rating, this these are the things that need to be refactored.
CodeFactor found multiple issues:
Function "sapply" is undesirable. As an alternative, use vapply() with an appropriate
FUN.VALUE=argument to obtain type-stable simplification.Commit d3c8886
Commit d3c8886
Commit d3c8886
Commit d3c8886
Commit d3c8886
Commit d3c8886
Commit d3c8886
Commit 0d55e6d
Commit 0d55e6d
Commit ee8d3ef