Skip to content

TAS-186: Final article-equivalence claim checker and audit #311

@AtlantisPleb

Description

@AtlantisPleb

Summary

  • combine every prerequisite into one machine-readable checker and one final
    audit

Roadmap Position

  • Phase: Phase 9. Final closeout
  • Sequence: article-gap closure after TAS-156A
  • Owned-route boundary: any canonical article route referenced here means the psionic-transformer-based route established by TAS-156A / TAS-160, not a reintroduced mixed implementation spread across model or runtime crates.
  • Claim posture: necessary for article-equivalent closure, but not sufficient by itself to widen public capability claims

Description

  • aggregate:
    • canonical Transformer stack audit
    • non-fixture article-model artifact requirement
    • article frontend/compiler gate
    • article-interpreter-breadth gate
    • Transformer-backed reference-linear direct proof
    • Transformer-backed reference-linear exactness gate
    • anti-memorization gate
    • dataset-contamination and evaluation-independence audit
    • tokenization and representation invariance gate
    • fast-route gate
    • demo/benchmark gate
    • no-spill operator gate
    • interpreter-ownership gate
    • KV-cache and activation-state discipline verdict
    • route-minimality audit
    • reproducibility matrix
    • publication verdict
  • publish one disclosure-safe but fully explicit final audit that answers:
    • what article lines are now truly matched?
    • what is the mechanistic verdict?
    • what is the behavioral verdict?
    • what is the operational verdict?
    • what model is canonical?
    • what weight artifact is canonical?
    • what route is canonical?
    • what machine matrix is in scope?
    • what still remains excluded?

Why This Matters

  • the whole purpose of this roadmap is to answer this question exactly

Primary Surfaces

  • psionic-transformer (canonical owned article-route base for this issue)
  • psionic-eval
  • psionic-research
  • psionic-provider
  • docs/audits
  • scripts/

Validation

  • final claim-checker script
  • negative tests for every missing prerequisite
  • source-to-claim audit

Claim Discipline

  • Keep machine-legible boundaries explicit; partial progress must not be presented as full article equivalence.
  • Preserve typed refusal, fallback, blocked, and suppressed posture where closure is still incomplete.
  • Keep public language bounded to the declared article envelope rather than implying generic arbitrary-program closure from a partial green result.

Done When

  • there is one binary article-equivalence gate
  • and one final audit that cites only green machine-readable prerequisites

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    tassadarPsionic Tassadar roadmap work

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions