-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Closed
Labels
tassadarPsionic Tassadar roadmap workPsionic Tassadar roadmap work
Description
Summary
- combine every prerequisite into one machine-readable checker and one final
audit
Roadmap Position
- Phase: Phase 9. Final closeout
- Sequence: article-gap closure after
TAS-156A - Owned-route boundary: any canonical article route referenced here means the
psionic-transformer-based route established byTAS-156A/TAS-160, not a reintroduced mixed implementation spread across model or runtime crates. - Claim posture: necessary for article-equivalent closure, but not sufficient by itself to widen public capability claims
Description
- aggregate:
- canonical Transformer stack audit
- non-fixture article-model artifact requirement
- article frontend/compiler gate
- article-interpreter-breadth gate
- Transformer-backed reference-linear direct proof
- Transformer-backed reference-linear exactness gate
- anti-memorization gate
- dataset-contamination and evaluation-independence audit
- tokenization and representation invariance gate
- fast-route gate
- demo/benchmark gate
- no-spill operator gate
- interpreter-ownership gate
- KV-cache and activation-state discipline verdict
- route-minimality audit
- reproducibility matrix
- publication verdict
- publish one disclosure-safe but fully explicit final audit that answers:
- what article lines are now truly matched?
- what is the mechanistic verdict?
- what is the behavioral verdict?
- what is the operational verdict?
- what model is canonical?
- what weight artifact is canonical?
- what route is canonical?
- what machine matrix is in scope?
- what still remains excluded?
Why This Matters
- the whole purpose of this roadmap is to answer this question exactly
Primary Surfaces
psionic-transformer(canonical owned article-route base for this issue)psionic-evalpsionic-researchpsionic-providerdocs/auditsscripts/
Validation
- final claim-checker script
- negative tests for every missing prerequisite
- source-to-claim audit
Claim Discipline
- Keep machine-legible boundaries explicit; partial progress must not be presented as full article equivalence.
- Preserve typed refusal, fallback, blocked, and suppressed posture where closure is still incomplete.
- Keep public language bounded to the declared article envelope rather than implying generic arbitrary-program closure from a partial green result.
Done When
- there is one binary article-equivalence gate
- and one final audit that cites only green machine-readable prerequisites
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
tassadarPsionic Tassadar roadmap workPsionic Tassadar roadmap work