chore: repo hardening (CI workflow)#1
Open
MukundaKatta wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds a GitHub Actions CI workflow at
.github/workflows/ci.yml.What it does:
main.src/andtest/.jsfile parses cleanly vianode --checkacross Node 18, 20, and 22 (the supportedenginesrange).package.jsonis well-formed JSON.Why
node --checkrather thannpm test: the package re-exports sibling scoped packages that may not be published yet, so a full module-resolving test run could fail in CI for reasons unrelated to this repo's code. The syntax gate is fast, dependency-free, and always reflects real errors.This change is purely additive and non-breaking: it only adds a new workflow file and does not modify any existing source, tests, or configuration.